An Analysis of Cooperative Principle Maxim in the Written and Spoken Mode of Communication between Teacher and Students during Online Learning
Abstract
This study had analyzed the application of the Cooperative Principles maxim in the teacher and students’ interaction during online learning, either in the spoken or written mode of communication. Previous research argues that there are some differences in interaction through spoken and written modes of communication. This current research analyzed the differences between the application of Cooperative principles maxim in the spoken and written mode of communication, it is because most of the research about Cooperative principles maxim only analyzed the utterances in one mode of communication. Then, although there is research on the Cooperative Principle maxim in both modes of communication still not been found that compared the Cooperative Principle maxim in the context of teacher and student interaction in that two modes of communication. This current research employed the descriptive qualitative method. The vocational high school students become the participants of this study because there is a must for them to be fluent in English because of the need to work after they graduate. The researcher is the primary instrument. However, the researcher also used a secondary instrument to find results. The secondary tool is the table used by some previous research on analyzing the flouting and violating of the maxim. Further, the results show in the teacher and students' interaction through the spoken mode of communication, that the most maxim flouted by the teacher and students is the maxim of quantity. Then, the most maxim violated in the spoken mode of communication by the teacher is the maxim of quantity however, students violated the maxim of quality. In the written mode of communication, teachers flouted the maxim quantity and manner for the most, but students flouted the maxim of quality and manner. However, the researcher did not find the occurrence of a violation of the maxim in the written mode of communication.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agung, S., & Kurnianingtyas, W. (2016). The Violation of Cooperative Principles on Students’ Responses Toward Teacher Questions in Tefl Class. Kodifikasia, 10(1), 144540.
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies.
Ariyanti, L., Setiawan, S., & Wedawati, M. T. (2020). Exploring Implicature via WhatsApp: The Maxim of Conversation Analysis. The Asian ESP Journal, 51. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manal-Muhammad-2/publication/342620740_A_Linguistic_Study_of_’’and’’_w_in_Arabic_and_English/links/61e6649d70db8b034ca0b8bd/A-Linguistic-Study-of-and-w-in-Arabic-and-English.pdf#page=48
Ariyati, D. A. (2017). Conversational Implicature Based on the Cooperative Principle of Humorous Utterances in Reader’s Digest Magazine. Universitas Islam Negeri Makassar. http://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/7556/1/DIEN AFNI ARIYATI.pdf
Arofah, S., & Mubarok, H. (2021). An Analysis of Violation and Flouting Maxim on Teacher-Students Interaction in English Teaching and Learning Process. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i2.28148
Awwad, A. S., Ayasreh, A. M., Ayasrah, N. M., & AL-Sabti, N. (2019). Interpretations of the Gricean Conversational Maxims Violations. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 14(22), 4100–4104. http://www.ripublication.com/ijaer19/ijaerv14n22_02.pdf
Cutting, J. (2005). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (1st editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994597
Devi, A. E. (2017). An Analysis Cooperative Principle of Gracian Maxim in Lecturer-Students Interaction (An Analysis). http://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/8591/
Dewi, M. C. S., & Indriani, L. (2021). Unraveling the Use of Quantity Maxim among EFL Learners on Online Classroom Interaction. New Language Dimensions, 1(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v1n2.p55-64
Dwi, A. (2015). An analysis of flouting maxim in EFL classroom interaction. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 4(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv4i21592
Ekowati, A., & Sofwan, A. (2014). The Use Of Pragmatic Deixis In Conversation Texts in “Pathway to English.†Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 43(2), 71–78. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/LIK/article/view/3339/pdf_2
Farista, N. R., Bharati, D. A. L., & Fitriati, S. W. (2018). The effectiveness of roundtable and one stay two strays techniques to teach speaking skill to students with high and low self-confidence. English Education Journal, 8(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/EEJ.V8I3.21350
Fatmawati, S. N. K. (2015). A pragmatic analysis of maxim flouting performed by Solomon Northup in 12 Years A Slave movie. Yogyakarta State University. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/16012/1/Siti Nur Khasanah Fatmawati 10211144039.pdf
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Halliday, M. A. K. H., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press, USA.
Hilmi, A. (2013). Studi Mahasiswa: Masalah Akademik dan Perilaku di Kelas dihadapan guru Bahasa Inggris di Tahun Pertama Masuk Kerja. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/11305
How Communication Works. (2019). Grice’s Cooperative Principle: How to Mean More than You Say. youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qj5w216eNIQ&feature=youtu.be
Hutahaean, D. T. (2020). The Cooperative Principle Violation in Classroom Teaching Learning Proccess. Wiralodra English Journal, 4(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v4i1.74
Khusna, F. A., Aliyah, S. L., & Asyifah, D. A. (2021). Investigating The Use Of Maxims in The EFL Class Presentation: A Pragmatic Study. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2021.22.80
Kurniati, M., & Hanidar, S. (2018). The Flouting of the Gricean Maxims in the Movies Insidious and Insidious 2. Lexicon, 5(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v5i1.41282
Linawati, D. (2013). A Gricean Maxim Analysis of an English Teacher’s Talks in SMPN 1 KALASAN. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/25702/1/Dwi Linawati 07202244059.pdf
Magnis-Suseno, F. (1984). Etika jawa. Sebuah Analisa Falsafi Tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. https://doi.org/979-40-30058
Muhammad, A. A., & Karim, H. A. (2019). An Analysis of Grice’s Cooperative Principles in Some Selected English TV Interviews. Journal of the University of Garmian, 6(1).
Muste, D. (2016). The Role of Communication Skills in Teaching Process. Selection and Peer-Review under Responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the Conference. The European Proceedings of Behavioral and Social Sciences EpSBS. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.12.52
Nugraha, S. I. (2017). The Flouting Of Cooperative Principle Maxims: Implications for teaching of Pragmatics in the EFL Classroom. Indonesian EFL Journal, 3(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v3i2.670
Puspitaningrum, D. A. (2013). Maxim flouting in the main characters’ utterances in Confessions of a Shopaholic movie. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/19405/1/Dyah Ayu Puspitaningrum 09211141014.pdf
Putri, A. E. (2022). Flouting conversational maxim by English Department students at UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/id/eprint/52648
Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2016). The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 514–534.
SAFITRI, L. U. H. M., Seken, I. K., & Putra, I. N. A. J. (2014). * Observance and Non-observance of Gricean Maxims in Instructional Context: an Analysis of Efl Classroom Interaction. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v2i1.1434
Sastromiharjo, A., & Febtiani, D. A. (2020). The Realization of the Principles of Conversation in the Teachers and Students’ Speech in Indonesian Classroom Interaction. 4th Asian Education Symposium (AES 2019), 203–206.
Shaleha, M. (2016). Penggunaan Gaya Bahasa Hiperbola Pada Kata-Kata Mario Teguh. https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/21873-Full_Text.pdf
Situmorang, S. (2019). Non-observance Of The Maxims in EFL Classroom Interaction at SMA GKPI PAmeng Padang Bulan in Medan. http://repository.uhn.ac.id/handle/123456789/2799
Suardi, W. (2020). Catatan Kecil Mengenai Desain Riset Deskriptif Kualitatif. EKUBIS, 2(1), 1–11.
Tupan, A. H., & Natalia, H. (2008). The multiple violations of conversational maxims in lying done by the characters in some episodes of Desperate Housewives. K@ Ta Lama, 10(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.10.1.63-78
Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2019). The researcher as an instrument. World Conference on Qualitative Research, 33–41. 10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_3
Wahyudi, A., Yusuf, S., & Lestari, Z. W. (2020). Maxim’s flouting: An analysis of classroom interaction. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 219–231. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/JEET/article/view/10842/5629
Yatun, Y. (2019). An investigation of Non-Observance of Maxim in Teacher’s Instruction of Cadet Afternoon Speaking Class at Merchant Marine Polytechnic. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik Dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS), 1, 551–560. file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/39072-97660-1-PB.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jamr.3.1.19-43
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Rutmiarta Gultom
Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (JAMR) is published by Research and Community Service Department (LPPM) Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia.
Address: Jl. Kaligawe Raya Km. 4 Semarang, Indonesia.