The Combination of Legal System: Reconciliation of Divorce Cases in Dayak Ngaju Customary Law and Positive Law Systems

Ibnu Elmi Acmad Slamat Pelu, Ahmad Dakhoir, Go Lisanawati, Jefry Tarantang

Abstract


This study aim to observe a legal rationale regarding a legal-system implementation of Dayak Ngaju customary dispute reconciliation in Kuala Kurun, Gunung Mas Regency, Central Kalimantan Province. In practice, the researchers found a combination performed autonomously in the legal system. Such combination was a society’s belief in using both customary legal system and positive legal system. The idea of this combination was underlined by a reflection of legal rationale finding two legal systems (customary and positive) functioned respectively where suitability occurred between legal culture of living law and formal law. The principle of a combination of legal system was an evidence of a new insight or a new paradigm through factual and norm elaborations from Dayak Ngaju customary divorce reconciliation case. This study used descriptive and analytical qualitative research method on the phenomenon of Dayak Ngaju customary dispute reconciliation in Central Kalimantan. The result obtained was implementation of a legal combination (both customary and national), instead of only an effort of a harmonization. However, the result show that implementation was not practically able to replace a naturalist paradigm, yet both were believed by the society to be able to achieve philosophical goal of a law, a peace.


Keywords


Combination; Customs; Divorce; Reconciliation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Aditya, Zaka Firma, “Romantisme Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia : Kajian Atas Konstribusi Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia,†Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8.1 (2019), 37

Ahmad Ulil Aedi, Sakti Lazuardi, Ditta Chandra Putri, “ARSITEKTUR PENERAPAN OMNIBUS LAW MELALUI TRANSPLANTASI HUKUM NASIONAL PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (Architecture of the Application of Omnibus Law Through National Legal Transplantation Formation of Law),†Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14.2 (2020), 1–18

Ansori, Lutfil, “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif,†Jurnal Yuridis, 4.2 (2018), 148

Antoni, A, “Menuju Budaya Hukum (Legal Culture) Penegak Hukum Yang Progresif,†Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 2019, 237–50

Aristoni, and Junaidi Abdullah, “4 Dekade Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia : Menelisik Problematika Hukum Dalam Perkawinan Di Era Modernisasi,†Jurnal Yudisia, 7.1 (2016)

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar, “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer,†Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 3.2 (2019), 145–60

Briando, Bobby, “Prophetical Law: Membangun Hukum Berkeadilan Dengan Kedamaian,†Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14.3 (2017), 1–12

Endri, “Pluralisme Hukum Indonesia Bagi Hakim Tata Usaha Negara: Antara Tantangan Dan Peluang,†Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3.1 (2020), 19–34

Farid, Edi Kurniawan, “Paradigma Dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S . Kuhn Serta Relevansinya Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman,†Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 19.1 (2021), 84–99

Gunawan, Jasardi, “Studi Rekognisi Masyarakat Adat Di Amerika Dan Indonesia,†JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5.2 (2021), 220–31

Hajiji, Merdi, “Relasi Hukum Dan Politik Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia,†Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2.3 (2013), 361

Karjoko, Lego, Zaidah Nur Rosidah, and I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rahmi Handayani, “Refleksi Paradigma Ilmu Pengetahuan Bagi Pembangunan Hukum Pengadaan Tanah,†Bestuur, 7.2 (2020), 1

Kesuma, Ulfa, and Ahmad Wahyu Hidayat, “Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma,†Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 2020, 166

Lathif, Nazaruddin, “Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana Alat Untuk Memperbaharui Atau Merekayasa Masyarakat,†Palar | Pakuan Law Review, 3.1 (2017), 73–94

Lintang, Loresta Cahyaning, Adriano Martufi, and J W Ouwerker, “The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada,†Bestuur, 9.1 (2021), 13–25

Maryani, Desy, “Implikasi Positivisme Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum,†Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 2.1 (2019), 1–24

Najwan, Johni, “Implikasi Aliran Positivisme Terhadap Pemikiran Hukum,†Jurnal Law Positivism, Implication, Analytical Jurisprudence, Vol. 2 No. (2010)

Nurjaya, I Nyoman, “Memahami Kedudukan Dan Kapasitas Hukum Adat Dalam Politik Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,†Perspektif, 16.4 (2011), 236

Okasha, Samir, “Philosophy of Science Very Short Introductio,†7.9 (2016), 27–44

Rahmat, Aulia, “Rasionalisasi Hukum Alam Oleh Hugo Grotius: Dari Humanisasi Menuju Sekularisasi,†Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2.2 (2020), 433–70

Rusma, N, Struktur Narasi Perkawinan Dayak Maanyan, 2020

Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning, and Ade Adhari, “Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016),†Jurnal Konstitusi, 17.1 (2020), 104

Smith, Peter Godfrey, “Theory and Reality: An Introduction To The Philosophy of Science†(Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003)

Sudjana, “Penerapan Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence W Friedman Terhadap Efektivitas Perlindungan Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2000,†Al Amwal (Hukum Ekonomi Syariah), 2.1 (2019), 78–94

Sugiantari, Anak Agung Putu Wiwik, “Perkembangan Hukum Indonesia Dalam Menciptakan Unifikasi Dan Kodifikasi Hukum,†Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 5.2 (2015), 109–22

Suhartono, Slamet, “Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya,†DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15.2 (2019), 201–11

Tumbel, Zinade, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Budaya Masyarakat Adat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia,†Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, VIII.1 (2020)

Warburton, Nigel, Philosophy: The Basics, Fifth Edition, Philosophy: The Basics, Fifth Edition, 2013

Weruin, Urbanus Ura, “Teori-Teori Etika Dan Sumbangan Pemikiran Para Filsuf Bagi Etika Bisnis,†Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3.2 (2019), 313

Books:

Adiyanta, F C Susila, “Hukum Dan Proses Pengambilan Putusan Oleh Hakim : Menelusuri Khasanah Diskursus Tentang Teori-Teori Adjudikasi [ Theories of Adjudication ],†4.2 (2021), 252–64

Atmadja, I Dewa Gede, I Nyoman Putu Budiarta, “Teori-Teori Hukum,†2018, 233

Chike, Bonaventure, and D Ph, “An Analysis of Thomas Kuhn ’ s Concept of Scientific Revolution,†7.1 (2021), 1–14

Chmers, Alan Francis, “What Is This Thing Called Science?,†Fourth Edi (Queensland: University of Queensland Press, 2013)

Cotterrell, Roger, The Politic of Jurisprudence (Philadelphia: University or Pennsylvania Press, 1989)

Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edi (Chicago: INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA of UNIFIED SCIENCE, 1970)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i1.20427

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Akta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:

Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id

Creative Commons License

JURNAL AKTA (eISSN : 2581-2114, pISSN: 2406-9426), This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).