Role of Notary / PPAT in Making Authentic Assets Towards False Document Description

Abstract

Actions carried out by a party that has falsified document information constitute an act that results in detrimental to the other person or the party concerned. The approach to the problem used in this paper is to use a normative juridical approach. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that: The responsibility of the perpetrators of falsifying document information in the Decision of the Tangerang City District Court Number. 721 / Pdt.G / 2014 / Pn.Tng fulfilled the element of responsibility for the perpetrator of the criminal act of falsifying the document's information, because the defendants had a deliberate element in not falsifying the document's information, because in this case the defendant was the main perpetrator, the party who ordered do, parties who participate in doing it, parties who deliberately persuade to do so, and parties who help do; The basis for the judge's consideration in the decision of the Tangerang City District Court Number. 721 / Pdt.G / 2014 / Pn.Tng, namely with juridical considerations in the form of statements of the accused, evidence and legal facts revealed in court; and It is known that the relevant Notary (Co-Defendant I), is a Notary who is responsible for the deed, is honest, independent and impartial, and maintains the honor of the Notary's position by being professional to come to trial when he is summoned as a co-defendant I. to punish Defendants I, II, and III in accordance with the petition submitted by the Plaintiff, namely reversing the names of the two land certificates, namely the object of the case onto the Plaintiff's name again.

Keywords: Role of Notary, Falsification of Information, Authentic Deed