Interprestation Teaching Of Human Rights Laws Against Material In Corruption Provisions

Abstract

So far, the problem of corruption is seen separately from human rights. Even in the conversation about the corruption Eradication agenda. Human rights enforcement perspective lacks attention. When in fact, human rights can be one of the tools of analysis of corrupt practices corruption Because always causes casualties items, namely for individuals, communities, and the State. By using human rights as a perspective in viewing and analyzing corruption, it can show victims and obligations that must be fulfilled by the State. Through human rights analysis. Elucidation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption by the Constitutional Court in its Decision dated July 25, 2006 Number 003 / PUU-IV / 2006 was declared Contrary to Article 28 D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution so that the Elucidation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law 31 Year 199 declared not to have binding legal force. The author is of the opinion that the Constitutional Court when conducting a judicial review of the law tends to see more from the point of view of the rights of suspects or Defendants rather than looking at the interests of Victims of corruption. The purpose of writing this article is to find out the development of the teachings against the law in the Corruption Act and to know the interpretation of human rights cases against the teachings of the nature of the material unlawful acts in corruption. The author is of the opinion that the Constitutional Court when conducting a judicial review of the law tends to see more from the point of view of the rights of suspects or Defendants rather than looking at the interests of Victims of corruption. The purpose of writing this article is to find out the development of the teachings against the law in the Corruption Act and to know the interpretation of human rights cases against the teachings of the nature of the material unlawful acts in corruption. The author is of the opinion that the Constitutional Court when conducting a judicial review of the law tends to see more from the point of view of the rights of suspects or Defendants rather than looking at the interests of Victims of corruption. The purpose of writing this article is to find out the development of the teachings against the law in the Corruption Act and to know the interpretation of human rights cases against the teachings of the nature of the material unlawful acts in corruption.