The Revitalization of Extraordinary Legal Remedies Cassation for Legal Interests in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia

Jupriyadi Jupriyadi

Abstract


The decision of judges are not free from errors or mistakes, and often even shows partiality (not neutral) towards certain parties. Extraordinary legal action: cassation for legal purposes can be filed against all decisions that have obtained permanent legal force from other courts, apart from the Supreme Court. Great. The purpose of this research is to determine the factors that cause the Attorney General to rarely use the extraordinary legal remedy of cassation for legal purposes. To revitalize the extraordinary legal effort of cassation for legal purposes so that it can run effectively in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The findings from this research are that revitalization can be carried out by providing adequate explanations, especially the phrases "legal interests" and "must not harm interested parties" or even eliminating the provisions of Article 359 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, so that it does not give rise to different interpretations and judges can give fair decisions, without being shackled by the phrase "must not harm interested parties".


Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Adami Chazawi, 2011, Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana (Penegakan Hukum Dalam Penyimpangan Praktik & Peradilan Sesat), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Andi Hamzah dan Irdan Dahlan, 1987, Upaya-Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Pidana, Bina Aksaran, Jakarta;

Andi Sofyan dan Abd Asis, 2014, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Kedua, Kencana, Jakarta;

Aqshal Muhammad Arsyah, Cora Kristin Mulyani dkk, 2020, Kajian Labirin Hukum Penyelesaian Kasus Djoko Tjandra, Dewan Mahasiswa Justicia Fakultas Hukum UGM, Yogyakarta;

Didik Edro Purwoleksono, 2015, Hukum Acara Pidana, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya;

Jeremy Betham, 2010, Teori Perundang-Undangan, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana (The Theory of Legislation), diterjemahkan oleh Nurhadi, MA, Nusamedia, Bandung;

M. Yahya Harahap, 2012, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Mardjono Reksodiputro, 1994, Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Cet Pertama, Buku Kedua, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta;

Moeljatno, 1995, Azaz-Azaz Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta;

Moh. Mahfud MD., 2006, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi, Pustaka LP3ES, Jakarta;

Ramiyanto, 2019, Upaya-Upaya Hukum Perkara Pidana Di Dalam Hukum Positif dan Perkembangannya, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;

Rocky Marbun, Deni Bram dkk, 2012, Kamus Hukum Lengkap, Transmedia Pustaka, Jakarta;

Ronald Dworkin, 1986, Law’s Empire, The Belknap Press of Harvad University Press, Cambridge;

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 1998, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta;

YLBHI dan PSHK, 2007, Panduan Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia, YLBHI, Jakarta;

Journals:

Andri Winjaya Laksana, Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol. IV, No. 1, 2017;

Andri Winjaya Laksana, Pemidanaan Cybercrime Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif, Jurnal Hukum Unissula, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2019;

Andri Winjaya Laksana, The Protection of Human Rights in the Case of Non-Criminal Narcotics Users, SASI, Vol. 29, No. 4, December 2023;

Apri Listiyanto, Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Acara Pidana, Jurnal Rechts Vinding, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017;

Bilryan Lumempouw, Hak Terdakwa Melakukan Upaya Hukum Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana, Lex Crimen, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2013;

Fence M. Wantu, Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim, Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 19, No. 3 Oktober 2007;

M. Rustamaji, Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Melalui Telaah Sisi Kemanusiaan Aparat Penegak Hukum, Kanun Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2017;

M. Zen Abdullah, Urgensi Perlunya Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana Nasional di Indonesia Yang Lebih Responsif, Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Vol. 20, No.1, 2020,

Monica Sara Konardi, Upaya Hukum Kasasi Demi Kepentingan Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Universitas Atmajaya Yogyakarta, 2017;

Muhammad Ridha, Efektivitas Kasasi Demi Kepentingan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Lex Renaissan, No. 1, Vol. 6, 2021;

Rendi Renaldi Mumbunan, Upaya Hukum Biasa Dan Luar Biasa Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pidana, Lex Crimen, Vol. 7, No. 10, 2018;

Yaris Adhial Fajrin dan Ach. Faisol Triwijaya, Arah Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Tengah Pluralisme Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan, Vol.18 No.1, 2019;

Regulations:

Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2022, 2023 dan 2024.

Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v8i1.36764

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Law Reconstruction Indexed by :

DOAJgoogle_scholarsintacrossrefMendeley onesearch  dimension

International Journal of Law Recnstruction  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of International Journal of Law Reconstruction
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, E-ISSN 2775-8885 (Online)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112IJLR is licensed under a