PENYERAPAN AIR DAN KELARUTAN RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE MICROHYBRID, NANOHYBRID, PACKABLE DALAM CAIRAN ASAM

Arlina Nurhapsari*  -  Universitas Islam sultan Agung, Indonesia
Andina Rizkia Putri Kusuma  -  Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/odj.5.1.67-75
Background: Composite resin is the most widely used restoration material. This material is composed of several materials such as polymer matrix, fller particles and silane coupling agents. As technology progresses, microhybrid, nanohybrid and packable composite resin materials are developed, with good handling and mechanical properties. As a polymer-based material, the composite resin absorbs the liquid, causing the solubility of the resin matrix. Carbonated drinks and chlorine, are acidic liquids that can cause soluble resin matrix. The aim of this paper is to compare water sorption and solubility between composite resin type microhybrid, nanohybrid, packable from different brand.
Methods: This research used experimental method with sample of composite resin disk with diameter 15 mm and thickness 1 mm. The number of samples was 90 divided into 18 treatment groups, 9 group immersed in carbonated drinks and 9 group immersed in chlorine. The grouping is based on composite resin type microhybrid, nanohybrid, packable from different brand. Water sorption is measured by the sample mass difference before and after immersion then divided by the initial volume of the sample. While the solubility of the composite resin was measured by reducing the sample mass prior to submersion and after
drying then divided by the initial volume of the sample.
Result: The results showed signifcant differences in water sorption on chlorine, solubility in carbonated beverages and chlorine. Meanwhile, an insignifcant difference occurred in water sorption in carbonated beverages.
Conclusion: water sorption and solubility in 3 types of composite resin with
9 different product, not depend on the composite resin type but depend on the product used

Keywords: microhybrid; nanohybrid; packable; composite resin; water sorption;solubility; acid

  1. Anusavice,K.J.2005. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials 11thed, Rio de Janeiro Elsevier editor. 2. Anusavice,K.J.,Shen.C.,Rawls,H.R.2012. Phillip’s science of dental materials. Ed 12. St Louis:Elsevier
  2. Powers, J.M. dan Sakaguchi, R.L. 2012. Craig’s Restorative Dental Material.ed 13. Philadelphia: Elsevier
  3. Janus,J.,Fauxpoint,G.,Arntz,Y.,Pelletier,H.2010. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multi-technique approach. J
  4. Dent. Mater. 360-368.
  5. Burgess,J.O., Walker,R., Davidson, J.M.2002. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatric dentistry. 24(5): 465-479
  6. Ferracane,J.L.2006. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks Dental Materials.22(3): 211-222.
  7. Curtis,A.R.,Shortall,A.C.,Marquis,P.M., Palin,W.M. 2008.Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nanoflled resin-based
  8. composite. Journal of Dentistry.36(3)186-193.
  9. Zhang,Y.,Xu, J .2008. Effect of immersion in various media on the sorption, solubility, elution of unreacted monomers, and flexural properties of two model dental composite compositions
  10. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 19(6):2477–2483.
  11. Sideridou,I.,Tserki,V., Papanastasiou,G.2003. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of lightcured dimethacrylate-based dental resins .Biomaterials. 24(4): 655-665.
  12. Gonçalves,L.,Noronha Filho,J.D., Guimarães,J.G.A.,Poskus,L.T.,Silva,E.M . 2008. Solubility, salivary sorption and degree of conversion of dimethacrylate-based polymeric matrixes Journal of Biomedical Material Research
  13. Part B, Applied Biomaterials .85(2): 320-325.
  14. Silva,E.M.,Almeida, G.S.,Poskus,L.T., Guimarães, J.G.A.2008. Relationship between the degree of conversion, solubility and salivary sorption of a hybrid and a nanoflled resin composite: Influence of the light-activation mode. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 16(2): 161-166.
  15. Feilzer, A. J., Kakaboura, A. I., De Gee, A. J. Davidson, C. L.1995. The influence on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modifed glassionomer cements, Dent. Mater. 11 : 186-190.
  16. Moharamzadeh,K., Van Noort, R.,Brook, I. M., Scutt, A. M. 2007. Cytotoxicity of resin monomers on human gingival fbroblasts and HaCaT keratinocytes, Dent. Mater. 23: 40-44.
  17. Knezevic, A., Zeljezic, D., Kopjar, N., Tarle, Z. 2003. Cytotoxicity of composite materials polymerized with LED curing units, Oper. Dent. 33: 23-30.
  18. Puspitasari, N.B.,Hasya, A. 2014. Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Terhadap Produk Coca Cola, Pepsi, dan Big Cola di Kota Semarang dengan Analisis Konjoin.Seminar Nasional IENACO. 603-610.
  19. Jayanti, S., Ilza, M., Desmelati. 2012. Pengaruh Penggunaan Minuman Berkarbonasi untuk Menghambat Kemunduran Mutu Ikan Gurami (Osphronemus ourami) Pada Suhu Kamar. Jurnal Perikanan dan Kelautan.17(2): 71-87.
  20. Sartono. 2015.Hubungan Power Otot Lengan, Power Otot Tungkai dan Panjang Tungkai dengan Prestasi Renang Gaya Bebas. Jurnal Ilmiah EDUCATER 1(1): 1-19.
  21. Litan, B.F., Wowor, V.N.S. & Pangemanan D.H.C. 2016. Gambaran Status Erosi Gigi Pada Perenang di Kolam Renang Koni Sario. Pharmacon Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi-UNSRAT. 5(1):69-77.
  22. Radlinska, J.B., Lagocka, R., Kaczmarek, W., Gorski, M. Nowicka, A. 2013. Prevalence of Dental Erosion in Adolescent Competitive Swimmers Exposed to gas-klorinated Swimming
  23. Pool Water. Clin Oral Invest. 17(2013): 579-583.
  24. Tedesco,T.K., Gomes,N.G., Soares,F.Z., Rocha,R.O.2012.Erosive effects of beverages in the presence or absence of caries simulation by acidogenic challenge on human primary enamel: an in vitro study.Eur Arch Paediatr Dent.
  25. Feb;13(1):36-40
  26. Giannini M, Di Francescantonio M, Pacheco RR, Cidreira Boaro LC, Braga RR. Characterization of water sorption, solubility, and roughness of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite resins.Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):264-72
  27. Tamai,Y.,Tanaka,H.,Nakanishi,K.1995. Molecular simulation of permeation of small penetrant through membranes, II, Solubilities, Macromolecules 28: 2544-2554.
  28. Mortier,E., Jager,S., Gerdolle,D.A., Dahoun,A. 2013. Influence Of Filler Amount On Water Sorption And Solubility Of Three Experimental Flowable Composite Resins. Journal of Materials
  29. Science and Engineering with Advanced Technology.Vol7(1):35-48
  30. Torrey,J.D.2013. Effect of Chlorine vs. Chloramine Treatment Techniques on Materials Degradation. Reclamation Infrastructure.
  31. Technical Memorandum No. MERL-2013-57
  32. Cilli, R., Pereira, J.C., Prakki, A. 2012. Properties of Dental Resins Submitted to pH Catayzed Hydrolysis. SciVerse ScienceDirect. 40(1) : 1144 – 1150.
  33. Rahim , T.N.A.T.R., Mohamad, D., Akil, H.M. & Rahman, I.A. 2012. Water Sorption Characteristic of Restoration Dental Composites Immersed in Acidic Drink. SciVerse ScienceDirect. (28) : e63-e70.
  34. Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al. Water sorption/ solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 2006;22(10):973–80.
  35. Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. 2009.Characterization of water sorption, solubility and fller particles of light cured composite resins. Braz Dent J. Jan; 20(4):314-318

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id
apps