Departement of Orthodontics, UNISSULA - Indonesia
The Relationship of Facial Soft Tissue A’N’B Angle and Facial Hard Tissue ANB Angle in Determination of Skeletal Relations
Background: Cephalometric analysis used in orthodontics to informs the diagnosis, treatment planning, quantifies changes during treatment, and provides data for clinical research. It has been used for determination of Skeletal Relations using facial hard tissue ANB Angle. Points A and B on the facial hard tissue correlate closely with the positions of the corresponding points on the soft tissue. This study aims to determine the relationship between the A'N’B angle of soft tissue and the ANB angle of hard tissue in determining the class of skeletal relations
Method: The sample used in this study was 75 cephalograms, which had been selected according to the criteria. Cephalometric tracing is done manually. Inter-observer and intra-observer measurements were carried out to increase the validity and reliability of the research instrument. The Bland-Altman method is used as a statistical fit test. The results of the research data were then tested for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For further testing to test the significance of the correlation coefficient obtained in the Pearson test, the significance test of the t-test is used.
Result: The results of t-count > t-table, which means that there is a strong linear relationship between hard tissue ANB and soft tissue A'N’B with a correlation coefficient (r) > 0.05.
Conclusion: The soft tissue A'N'B' angle can be used as an alternative in determining the class of skeletal relationships in addition to the hard tissue ANB angle
Method: The sample used in this study was 75 cephalograms, which had been selected according to the criteria. Cephalometric tracing is done manually. Inter-observer and intra-observer measurements were carried out to increase the validity and reliability of the research instrument. The Bland-Altman method is used as a statistical fit test. The results of the research data were then tested for normality with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For further testing to test the significance of the correlation coefficient obtained in the Pearson test, the significance test of the t-test is used.
Result: The results of t-count > t-table, which means that there is a strong linear relationship between hard tissue ANB and soft tissue A'N’B with a correlation coefficient (r) > 0.05.
Conclusion: The soft tissue A'N'B' angle can be used as an alternative in determining the class of skeletal relationships in addition to the hard tissue ANB angle
Keywords: Cephalometric Analysis; Skeletal Relation; A’N’B Angle; ANB Angle
- Cobourne M, DiBiase A. Handbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. London: Mosby Elsevier; 2015. p 151-8
- Gupta, A., On imaging modalities for cephalometric analysis: a review. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2023.
- Andria G, Attivissimo F, Lanzolla AML, Guglielmi G, Francavilla M, editors. Quality Assessment in Radiographic Images. 3rd edition. IMEKO TC13 Symp Meas Biol Med 2014 New Front Biomed Meas.;p13–6.
- Dental Radiographic Examinations: Recommendations For Patient Selection And Limiting Radiation Exposure. Am Dent Assoc, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, FDA. Revised: 2012
- Radiographic Contrast. Net Resourse Centre. https:// www.ndeed.org/ Education Resources/Community College/ Radiography/Tech Calibrations/contrast.htm
- Ramadhan, AZ., Sitam, S., Azhari, Epsilawati, L., Gambaran Kualitas Mutu Radiograf, Jurnal Radiologi Dentomaksilofasial Indonesia Desember 2019, Volume 3, Nomor 3: 43-8
- White S, J. Pharoah M, editors. Oral Radiology (Principle and Interpretation) 7th edition. Canada: Elsevier Mosby; 2014
- Haring J, Lind L. Dental Radiography Principles and Techniques. 5th ed. India: Elsevier; 2017. 463
- Khan SQ, Sobia AH, Mehdi H, Ashraf B. Quality assessment of lateral cephalometric radiographs. Pakistan Oral Dent J [Internet]. 2017;37(2):265–8
- Barnett DP. Variations In The Soft Tissue Profile And Their Relevance To The Clinical Assessment Of Skeletal Pattern. British Journal of Orthodontic.1975;2:235-8
- Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of Factors Affecting Angle ANB. Am J Orthod 1984 May;85(5):411-23.
- Ahmed M, Shaikh A , Fida M. Diagnostic Validity Of Different Cephalometric Analyses For Assessment Of The Sagittal Skeletal Pattern. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Sept-Oct;23(5):75-81.
- Le-Tien T, Pham-Chi H. An Approach for Efficient Detection of Cephalometric Landmarks. Procedia Computer Science 37 2014: 293 – 300
- Patel DP, Trivedi R. Photography Versus Lateral Cephalogram: Role in Facial Diagnosis. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2013, 24(5): 587-92.
- Bergman RT. Cephalometric Soft Tissue Facial Analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1999; 116: 373-89
- Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Asessment Of The Facial Profile: The Correlation Between Various Cephalometric Analysis And The Soft Tissue Angle Of Convexity. JPDA 2017 26(2):59-66
- Susilowati. Hubungan Antara Derajat Konveksitas Profil Jaringan Keras Dan Jaringan Lunak Wajah Pada Suku Bugis Dan Makassar. Dentofasial 2009 Vol. 8, No. 2: 125–30
- Sreenivasagan S, Sivakumar A. FSA Angle: A Soft Tissue Approach For Assessing Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2021, Volume 14 Special Issue 1: 54-6