PERBEDAAN EFEKTIFITAS RETENSI DAN PREVENTIF KARIES BAHAN PIT DAN FISSURE SEALANT

Hesti Witasari Jos Erry*  -  Yarsi University, Indonesia
Agus Ardinansyah  -  Bagian Pendidikan Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas YARSI, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Introduction: Dental caries is a fairly high dental disease that occurs in most countries, which is approximately 60-90% occur in children. Pit and Fissure sealants are materials that are placed on pits and dental fissures that aim to prevent dental caries. There are several types of materials which often used as pit and sealant fissures, including Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) and Resin-based Sealant/Composite Resin (RK). The purpose of this study is analising the differences in the effectiveness of retention and prevention of caries in GIC and RK pit and fissure sealants in elementary school children.
Method: The subjects are 76 permanent teeth of 7-8 years old children with a grouping of 38 teeth each based on the material tested of GIC and RK.
Results: There is a significant differences between the pit and fissure sealant material of GIC and RK in the effectiveness of retention and prevention of caries.
Conclusion: In the statistical calculation, the comparative effectiveness of retention and caries prevention pit and fissure sealant RK and GIC materials is significant difference. The RK material is more effective in retention and prevention of caries compared with GIC.

Keywords: GIC; permanent molars; pit and fissure sealants; resin-based sealants

  1. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan RI (2013) RISKESDAS 2012
  2. International Caries Detection and Assesment System Coordinating Committee. International Caries Detection and Assesment System (ICDAS) Criteria Manual. Baltimore USA. 2005
  3. Sukanto. Pit dan fissure sealent. https://sukantodrg.files.wordpress.com/.../pit-dan-fisssure-sealent-makalah-bab-1-42.d. pada 8 Maret 2017
  4. Mickenautsch S, Leal SC. How to Apply Evidence-based Minimum Intervention (MI) in the Dental Practice: A ‘Patient-based Learning’ Guide. 1st Ed. South Africa: Midentistry Corp. 2006.
  5. Andlaw, RJ and Rock. 1992. Perawatan Gigi Anak. Alih bahasa: Agus Djaya dari A Manual of Pedodontics. Jakarta: EGC
  6. Peter A., Paul JR., Retention and caries preventive effects of a GIC and a resin-based fissure sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995:23:282-5
  7. Songpaisan Y, Bratthal D, Phantumvanit P, Somridhivej Y.Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23: 25-9
  8. Anusavice, Kenneth J. 1994. Ilmu Bahan Kedokteran Gigi. Jakarta: EGC
  9. Ganesh, Mahadevan MDS, et al. 2007. Comparative Evaluation of The Marginal Sealing Ability of Fuji VII and Concise as Pit and Fissure Sealants.
  10. Van Meerbeek B., Inoue S., Perdigao., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Summit J,B., Robbin J,W., Schwartz R,S., Fundamental of Operative Dentistry A Contemporary Approach. 3rded Quintessence. Chicago. Pp183, 2006
  11. Reddy VR, Chowdhary N, Mukunda KS, Kavyarani BS, Pradeep MC. Retention of resin-based filled and unfilled pit and fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2015:6:18-23
  12. Hofmann N, Just N, Haller B, Hugo B, Klaiber B. The Effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 1998 Jun;2(2):77-83

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Contact us: Odonto Dental Journal: Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4, PO BOX 1054/SM Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112. Email: odontodentaljournal@unissula.ac.id
apps