Law Enforcement Jurisdiction In Cybercrime
Abstract
Crimes using technology, namely information technology, especially computers and the internet have reached an alarming stage. Combating internet crime has become a major portion of national and international law enforcement agencies and intelligence, including business practitioners, merchants, customers, and to the end-user. In most cases, internet crime starts with exploiting hosts and computer networks. The approach method used uses the normative juridical method, the results of the research obtained are that Law Enforcement regarding Cybercrime in Indonesia is manifested in the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and has been updated by Law Number 19 of 2016 Amendments to Law Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Transactions. Electronic where the provisions in criminal law are applied by means of extensive interpretation of laws and regulations that explicitly regulate crimes that attack computers and Jurisdiction related to law enforcement is regulated in 3 (three) areas of law enforcement, First, the authority to make substantive law is called legislative jurisdiction, Second, the authority to judge or apply law is called judicial or applicative jurisdiction. Third, the authority to implement/ enforce legal compliance that he makes is called executive jurisdiction.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achmadudin Rajab, Urgensi Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Sebagai Solusi Guna Membangun Etika Bagi Pengguna Media, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 14 No. 04 Desember 2017;
Ade Maman Suherman, 2005, Aspek Hukum Dalam Ekonomi Global, Edisi Revisi, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor;
Ahmad Muyasir, Kejahatan Defecting: Studi Perbandingan antara Undang-Undang ITE dan Hukum Pidana Islam, Al-Mazahib, Volume 3, Nomer 1, Juni 2015;
Ahmad M.Ramli, Perkembangan CyberLaw Global dan Implikasinya Bagi Indonesia, Makalah Seminar The Importance of Information System Security in E-Government,Tim koordinasi Telematika Indonesia, Jakarta, 28 Juli 2004;
Andri Winjaya Laksana, Cybercrime Comparison Under Criminal Law In Some Countries, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol V No.2 April-Agustus 2018;
Andri Winjaya Laksana, Pemidanaan Cybercrime Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif, Jurnal Hukum Unissula, Vol 35, No I (2019);
Barda Nawawi Arief, 1996, kebijakan legislatif dalam penanggulangan kejahatan dengan pidana penjara. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang;
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2003, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung;
Barda Nawawi Arief, 2003, Sari Kuliah: Perbandingan Hukum Pidana, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;
Bonanda Japatani Siregar, Problem dan Pengaturan Cybercrime Melalui Aktifitas Internet Dalam Kasus Sara Di Pilkada Serentak 2018, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 3. No. 1 2018;
Brown and Cameron S.D. Investigating and Prosecuting Cyber Crime: Forensic Dependencies and Barriers to Justice, International Journal of Cyber Criminology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015;
Ediwarman, 2016, Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, genta Publishing, Yogyakarta;
Edmon Makarim, 2003, Kompilasi Hukum Telematika, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta;
Loebby Loqman, 2002, Kapita Selekta Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perekonomian, Cetakan Pertama, Datacom, Jakarta;
Mahfud MD, 2000, Politik Hukum Nasional, Alumni, Bandung;
Rachmat Rafiudin, 2009, Internet Foeronsik,CV Andi Offset, Yogyakarta;
Sri Sumarwani, Tinjauan Yuridis Pemidanaan Cybercrime Dalam Perpektif Hukum Pidana Positif, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume I No. 3 September-Desember 2014;
Supanto, Perkembangan Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) dan Antisipasinya Dengan Penal Policy, Yustisia, Vol.5 No.1 Januari-April 2016;
Widodo, 2013, Aspek Hukum Pidana Kejahatan Mayantara, Aswaja Pressindo, Yogyakarta;
Yudha Bhakti Ardhiwisastra, 1999, Imunitas Kedaulatan Negara di Forum Pengadilan Asing, Alumni, Bandung;
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.