THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTING PENALTIES FOR PERSONS OF THE CRIME OF BRIBERY ASSISTANCE

Parulian Kertagama

Abstract


The crime of bribery is the act of giving money and goods or other forms of money from the bribe giver to the bribe recipient which is carried out to change the recipient's attitude regarding the interests of the giver, even though this attitude is contrary to the recipient's. So that in bribery there are transactional actions related to easy access to obtain profits through policies issued by bribe recipients who are state administrators in violation of the law. In its development, the crime of bribery is different from the crime of extortion and the crime of gratification. This research uses sociological juridical legal research with the aim of systematically describing the facts and characteristics of the research object being studied accurately. This research went through a literature study stage, the data obtained was then analyzed using a qualitative analysis approach. Processing and analysis of qualitative data generally places greater emphasis on processing primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The regulatory formulation regarding the punishment system for perpetrators of assisting bribery in criminal acts of corruption is currently unable to provide legal certainty, this is due to the non-regulation of provisions regarding perpetrators of assisting bribery in Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, in addition to the implementation of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes has not adapted UNCAC 2003 which regulates bribery corruption in the private sector. The weakness in the formulation related to the punishment system for perpetrators of assisting bribery in criminal acts of corruption who are not current Civil Servants or State Administrators is in the regulatory aspect, namely that the provisions regarding perpetrators of assisting in Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes has had implications for misapplication of the law in punishing perpetrators of assistance. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as regulated in the 2003 UNCAC.


Keywords


Assistance; Bribery; Conviction; Crime.

References


Shinta Dewi Rismawati, “Menebarkan Keadilan Sosial Dengan Hukum Progresif Di Era Komodifikasi Hukum”, Jurnal Hukum Islam (JHI), Volume 13, Nomor 1, 2015.

Noeng Muhadjir, Filsafat Ilmu, Edisi II, Rake Sarasin, Yogyakarta, 2001. Indriyanto Seno Adji, Korupsi dan Permasalahannya, Diadit Media, Jakarta, 2012. Sudarto, Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Alumni, Bandung, 1977.

DPR RI, Risalah Dengar Pendapat Umum Pembahasan Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2001, hlm. 2-3.

Pusat Pendidikan Anti Korupsi, Karakteristik Tindak Pidana Suap, diakses melalui https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20220426-ini-beda-gratifikasi- suap-pemerasan-dan-uang-pelicin, pada 12 Juni 2022.

Pusat Pendidikan Anti Korupsi, Karakteristik Tindak Pidana Suap, diakses melalui https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20220426-ini-beda-gratifikasi- suap-pemerasan-dan-uang-pelicin, pada 12 Juni 2022.

https://yurismuda.com/perbedaan-penyertaan-dan-pembantuan-dalam-tindak- pidana/, diakses pada 12 Mei 2023.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.3.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: