EFFECTIVENESS OF APPLYING PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY OF JUSTICE IN THE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL CASE

ELif Acar, Sugeng Sudrajat

Abstract


The effectiveness of judges' verdict in the trial should ideally contain aspects of the rule of law, justice and expediency. In its implementation is not easy to synergize these three aspects, especially the aspect of legal certainty and fairness are usually contradictory. The results showed that the judge in examining and deciding cases not forever fixated on one principle alone. Constraints faced by judges tend to rule of law in deadlock when written provisions can not answer the problems that exist. Emphasis is more inclined to the principle of justice means should consider a law in society, which is made up of customs and unwritten laws. Judge within reason and legal considerations must be able to accommodate all the provisions that live in the community in the form of customs and unwritten laws. Emphasis tends to be on the principle of expediency over economic nuances.

Keywords


Effectiveness; Legal Certainty; Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Butarbutar, Elisabet Nurhaini. “Konsep Keadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan pidanaâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Vol. 21 No. 3. Juni 2009. Yogyakarta: FH UGM.

Goesniadhie, Kusnu S. “Perspektif Moral Penegakan Hukum Yang Baikâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 17 No. 2. April 2010. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Hartini. “Pengecualian Terhadap Penerapan Asas Ultra Petitum Partum Dalam Beracara di Pengadilan Agamaâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 21 No. 2; Juni 2009; Yogyakarta: FH UGM.

Herdyanto, Edy. “Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Sebagai Kendali Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Di Indo-nesiaâ€. Jurnal Yustitia. Vol. 72. September-Desember 2007.

Surakarta: FH Uni-versitas Sebelas Maret Indah, C Maya S. “Mewujudkan Sistem Peradilan Berwibawa Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Media Hukum.

Vol. 14 No. 3. November 2007. Yogyakarta: FH UMY Kanter. 2000. “Etika Profesi Hukum: Sebuah Pendekatan Sosio-Religiusâ€. Cetakan Per-tama. Jakarta:Storia Grafika.

Mahyuni. “Lembaga Damai Dalam Proses Penye-lesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilanâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 16 No. 4. Oktober 2009. Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Marzuki, Pieter Mahmud, 2006. Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Kedua Mei. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Muhammad, Rusli. “Strategi Dalam Membangun Kembali Kemandirian Pengadilan Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 25 No. 11. April 2004. Yogyakarta.

Rosadi, Otong. “Hukum Kodrat, Pancasila dan Asas Hukum dalam Pembentukan Hukum Di Indonesiaâ€. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 10 No. 3. September 2010. Purwoker-to: FH Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

Sufriadi, Yanto. “Penerapan Hukum Progresif Dalam Pemulihan Krisis Hukum Di Tengah Kemacetan Demokrasi di Era Globalâ€. Jur-nal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 17 No. 2. April 2010.

Yogyakarta: FH UII.

Wantu, Fence M. “Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakimâ€. Jurnal Mimbar Hu-kum. Vol. 19 No. 3. Oktober 2007. Yogya-karta: FH UGM.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v5i3.3745

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a