THE NON-EXECUTABLE CIVIL DECISION: WILL THEY GET LEGAL CERTAINTY?
Abstract
The aims of this research is to analyze the basis for judges' considerations in issuing non-executory civil case decisions and to analyze the legal consequences that arise after the civil case decision is declared unexecutable. This legal research is a type of normative or doctrinal research that is descriptive analytical in nature. The results of this study are that non-executory reasons are not directly regulated in the HIR/Rbg, these reasons are regulated in Book II, Edition 2013: Technical Guidelines for Administrative Courts and Technical Courts for General and Special Civil Courts. The legal consequences of civil case decisions that are declared unexecutable by the Court judge because the execution must be stopped on the grounds of error in objecto. The novelty in this writing is that a decision that contains an error in the object that causes the decision to lose its enforceable power, then based on Article 231 RBg, the judge must order the execution seizure of the land on which the execution order is placed to be revoked and then its status returned to its original state.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Andri Winjaya Laksana (etc)., Lembaga dan Pranata Hukum, Tahta Media Grup, Medan, 2024.
Hari Sasangka dan Ahmad Rifai., Perbandingan HIR dengan RBG: Disertai dengan Yurisprudensi MARI dan Kompilasi Peraturan Hukum Acara Perdata, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2005.
M. Yahya Harahap., Hukum Acara Perdata cet. (10), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.
Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti., Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Oleh Pemerintah / Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad (OOD) Dari Sudut Pandang Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2018.
Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata., Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2005.
Rocky Marbun., Kamus Hukum Lengkap, Visi Media, Semarang, 2012.
Sudikno Mertokusumo., Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 2002.
Journals:
Achmad Ganis Poernomo, M. Sholehuddin., Execution of Non-Executable Court Decisions in Case No.757/Pdt.G/2022/Pn.Jkt.Pst, ACITYA WISESA: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 3, Issue. 1 (2024).
Adinda Maretsyah Purba dan Fauziah Lubis., Hambatan Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata, Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik 6, No. 3 (2024).
Azizah Kamilah Putri (etc)., Judicial Study: Parties' Opposition (Partij Verzet) in Proceedings to Execute Land Ownership Rights Under Civil Procedure Law, Justisi 10, Issue. 3 (2024).
Chuasanga A., Ong Argo Victoria., Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia and Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum 2, No. 1 (2019).
Dikdik Somantri., Challenges in Execution of Court Decision To Strengthen The Administrative Court Charisma, Jurnal Hukum Peratun 4, No. 2 (August 2021).
Emiasari Sarumaha., Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pemidanaan Kepada Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Yang Dilakukan Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 10/Pid.Sus-Anak/2016/PNSgm), Jurnal Panah Keadilan 2, No. 2 (2023).
Hassanain Haykal, Theo Negoro., One Number One Citizen in Indonesia: Solution for Problematic in Court Execution Issues, Dialogia Iuridica 14, No. 1 (2022).
Heppy Indah Hapsari., Studi Putusan Yang Tidak Dapat Dieksekusi (Non Eksekutable) Dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Nomor 16/Pdt.Plw/2014/PN.Kdl), Jurnal Verstek 6, No. 2 (2018).
Hilda Ananda and Siti Nur Afifah., Penyelesaian Secara Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi, Sharecom: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Keuangan Islam 1, No. 1 (2023).
I Wayan Yasa and Echwan Iriyanto., Kepastian Hukum Putusan Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkara Perdata, Jurnal Rechtens 12, No. 1 (2023).
Inge Dwisvimiar, Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, No. 3 (September 2011).
M. Elpha Darnia (etc)., Strategi Penguatan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Era Digital. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 1, No. 4 (2023).
Made Rendy Wicaksana Adiutama dan I Wayan Santika., Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Kegunaan Yang Dirasakan Dan Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Niat Berbelanja Kembali Pada Situs Tokobagus.com, E-Jurnal Manajemen 3, No. 10 (2014).
Marten Bunga., Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Gugatan Sederhana, Gorontalo Law Review 5, No. 1 (2022).
Melani Yustianing.A (etc)., Tinjauan Perlawanan Untuk Menunda Eksekusi Dalam Sengketa Perdata (Studi Kasus Perkara No: 8/Pdt.Plw/2000/PN Probolinggo), Jurnal Verstek 2, No. 3 (2014).
Melisa (etc)., Kedudukan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia, Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, No. 1 (2023).
Miftakhur Rokhman Habibi, Judgement., Legal Attempt and Execution of Criminal Law in Indonesia, De Recht: Journal of Police and Law Enforcement 1, No. 2 (2024).
Mohammad Naefi and Dian Latifiani., Akibat Hukum Putusan Gugatan Sederhana Tidak Dijalankan bagi Para Pihak, Pandecta 16, No. 2 (2021).
Nugrohandhini, Dwi & Etty Mulyati., Akibat Hukum Gugatan dan Perlawanan Terhadap Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, No. 1 (2019).
Trivena Gabriela Miracle Tumbel (etc)., Perlindungan Konsumen Jual Beli Online Dalam Era Digital 4.0, Lex Et Societatis 8, No. 3 (2020).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v11i3.40154
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :
 | Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum | |
| Faculty of Law, Unissula | Copyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum | |
| Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, | ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print) | |
| Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112 | JPH is licensed under a |