The Application of Indirect Evidence in Cartel Practices
Abstract
KPPU tasked with overseeing business competition, confronts challenges in identifying and proving cartel practices. According to Article 1, paragraph 7 of Law Number 5 of 1999, agreements among business actors need not be written to constitute cartels, potentially allowing for covert operations. This absence of written documentation complicates KPPU's efforts to substantiate suspicions of cartel behavior, often hindering the discovery of tangible evidence necessary for legal proceedings. Consequently, proving cartel activities in court becomes arduous, as direct evidence is typically required while these agreements may lack physical documentation, posing ongoing challenges for regulatory enforcement. This research uses normative juridical research method. The aim of this research is to understand how indirect evidence is applied in the cooking oil cartel practices and reviewing the forms of legal protection for consumers who are harmed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Bhakti, R.T.A. (2015). Analisis Yuridis Dampak Terjadinya pasar oligopoli bagi persaingan usaha maupun konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 3(2), 69. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/cahayakeadilan/article/view/965
Fachri, F., & Joesoef, I. E. (2021). Analisis Pertimbangan KPPU Terhadap Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dilakukan Oleh Perusahaan Penerbangan BUMN (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 15/KPPU-I/2019). Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 9(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.33884/jck.v9i1.2764
Fitria, H. A. Q. (2018). Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan KPPU Nomor 24/KPPU-1/2009). Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v0i0.1755
Haryanto, I. (2021). Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis Tahu Sumedang Sebagai Aset Potensial Daerah. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 2(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v2i1.11667
Nugraha, A., et al. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Adanya Dugaan Praktek Kartel Harga Minyak Goreng Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(15), 56. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7040027
Siregar, M. (2018). Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), p.193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i2.910. Accessed from https://mail.ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jhsk/article/view/910
Pangestu, K., Suyanto, H., & Agustanti, R. D. (2021). Application of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Laws in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 12(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i01.a16996
Paripurno, L. D. (2011). Praktik Kartel Dalam Industri Minyak Goreng di Indonesia Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Skripsi). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Pratiwi, D. S., Arkusi, F., & Wardani, K. H. J. (2023). ANALISIS FAKTOR–FAKTOR YANG MENYEBABKAN KELANGKAAN MINYAK GORENG INDONESIA TAHUN 2022. JURNAL ECONOMINA, 2(12), 3688-3696.
Silalahi, U., & Edgina, I. C. (2017). Pembuktian Perkara Kartel Di Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Bukti tidak langsung (indirect evidence). Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v10i3.216
Tampubolon, W. S. (2016). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v4i1.356
Zega, I. G. (2012). Tinjauan Mengenai Indirect Evidence (Bukti tidak langsung (indirect evidence)) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Kasus Dugaan Kartel Fuel Surcharge Maskapai Penerbangan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Books:
Hamid, A. H., & SH, M. (2017). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia (Vol. 1). Sah Media.
Lubis, A. F., et al. (2017). Hukum Persaingan Kedua Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Kharisma Putra Utama.
Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Ochtorina, D., & Effendi, A. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2015). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Kharisma Putra Utama.
Internet:
Nanda Narendra Putra. “Berjuang Mencari Legitimasi Indirect Evidence” https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt598aba978d57c/berjuang-mencari-legitimasiindirect-evidence
Tim Hukumonline. Perlindungan Hukum: Pengertian, Unsur, dan Contohnya. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perlindungan-hukum-lt61a8a59ce8062/?page=all
Yohana Doloksaribu. Karten dan Dampaknya bagi Perekonomian. https://kumparan.com/3082210088yohana/kartel-dan-dampaknya-bagi-perekonomian-1xLWDW6N90R
Regulations:
Law Number 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition
Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection
KPPU Regulation Number 4 of 2010 on Implementation Guidelines Article 11 on Cartel
KPPU Regulation Number 4 of 2011 on Guidelines Article 5
KPPU Regulation Number 1 of 2019 on Procedures for Handling Cases of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition
Etc.
Kodrat Wibowo. (2020). Tantangan Pembuktian Ekonomi Dalam Kasus Kartel, PPT Webinar, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v7i2.38619
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in:
