The Position of Creditors Holding Fiduciary Securities in Bankruptcy
Abstract
Fiduciary is a transfer of ownership of a certain object by juridical levering from the original owner (debtor) to complete a debt agreement to the new owner based on trust alone (creditor), which is essentially a guarantee for the debtor's debt. On the other hand, the object remains under the debtor's control. The problem that occurs in a bankruptcy case is that in the settlement of bankruptcy assets, creditors holding fiduciary guarantees have the authority to execute their rights, as if bankruptcy had not occurred. The aim of writing this article is to analyze the settlement of bankruptcy assets to avoid regulatory conflicts between the Curator and Separatist Creditors. This type of research is normative legal research, namely legal research carried out by solving legal issues and at the same time providing prescriptions. It is prescriptive in nature, where it is legal research. That the position of separatist creditors in the bankruptcy process will take priority even if a bankruptcy occurs. This is stated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law which clearly states that priority rights are not extinguished even if bankruptcy occurs and Article 21 of the Mortgage Rights Law which states that the rights of separatist creditors are not lost in the event of bankruptcy and one of the rights Separatist creditors have the right to precede other creditors as stated in Article 20 paragraph (1) of the Mortgage Rights Law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andika Wijaya. (2017). Penanganan Perkara Kepailitan dan Perkara Penundaan Pembayaran Secara Praxis. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Andika Wijaya, & Wida Peace Ananta. (2018). Hukum Acara Pengadilan Niaga. Sinar Grafika.
Cohen, M. L., & Olson, K. C. (1992). Legal Research. St. Paul Minn.
Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra. (2013). Benturan Antara Kreditor Privilege Dengan Kreditor Preferen Pemegang Hipotek Kapal Laut Terkait Adanya Force Majeure. Jurnal Perspektif, 18.
Gunawan Widjaja, & Ahmad Yani. (2001). Jaminan Fidusia. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Herowati Poesoko, & Ivida Dewi Amrih Suci. (2016). Hukum Kepailitan: Kedudukan & Hak Kreditor Separatis. Laksbang Pressindo.
J. Satrio. (1996). Hukum Jaminan, Hak-Hak Jaminan Pribadi, Tentang Perjanjian Penanggungan Dan Perikatan Tanggung Menanggung. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kartini Mulyadi. (1998). Hakim Pengawas dan Kurator dalam Kepailitan. Makalah Seminar tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Kepailitan, oleh Pusat Pengkajian Hukum,.
Man S. Sastrawidjaja. (2014). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Alumni.
Moch. Isnaeni. (2017). Seberkas Diorama Hukum Kontrak . Revka Petra Media.
Munir Fuady. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Salim H.S. (2004). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia (Cetakan I). PT. Raja Grafindo.
Satjipto Rahardjo. (2000). Ilmu Hukum . Aditya Bakti.
Shinta Agustina. (2015). Implementasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Masalah Masalah Hukum.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, Asas dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan. Kencana.
Sri Soedewi Masyarakat Sofyan. (1981). Hukum Benda. Liberty.
Subhan, H. M. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Kencana.
Sularto. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis Dalam Kepailitan. Mimbar Hukum.
Wahyu Sasongko. (2007). Ketentuan-Ketentuan Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen . Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung.
Yulianto. (2004). Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Jaminan Kredit PerBankan. Mitra Usaha Abadi.
Yurizal. (2011). Aspek Pidana dalam Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Cetakan Keenambelas, MNC Publishing
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i1.41642
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Daulat Hukum has been indexed in: