Legal Responsibility for Notaries Involved in Corruption Crimes Land Procurement Logistics Agency

Hafid Khoirul Umam, Nanang Sri Darmadi

Abstract


This study aims to analyze: 1) The position of a notary in the event of a criminal act of corruption on land procurement at the Logistics Affairs Agency. 2) Legal accountability for notaries involved in criminal acts of corruption in land procurement for the Logistics Affairs Agency. This type of research includes the scope of normative legal research. The approach method used in this research is the case study approach and the statutory approach. This type of data uses secondary data obtained by literature study. The data analysis method used in this research is prescriptive. The research results concluded: 1). The position of a notary in the event of a criminal act of corruption in land acquisition for the Logistics Affairs Agency is as a party who participated in helping the KS commit corruption. The PC's actions in carrying out criminal acts together with KS are punishable by crime in Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption in conjunction with Article 55 Paragraph (1) 1 of the Criminal Code. PC misuses the authority, opportunity, or means available to him because of his position or position as a Notary. 2) Legal responsibility for notaries involved in criminal acts of corruption in land procurement for the Logistics Agency is individual responsibility and accountability based on error. The legal facts at the trial were that the Panel of Judges believed that PC's actions had fulfilled the formulation of the elements in Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Based on the decision Number 90/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/PN Smg, PC was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 (one) year and a fine of IDR 50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it will be replaced with a crime imprisonment for 1 month.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Abdul Jalal. Suwitno. Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. Keterlibatan Pejabat Notaris Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Turut Serta Melakukan Tindak Kejahatan Dalam Pemalsuan Dokumen. Jurnal Akta. Volume 5 Nomor 1 March 2018.

Ayu Pratiwi. Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Turut Serta Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Officium Notarium. No. 2 Vol. 2 August 2022.

Christin Sasauw. Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kekuatan Mengikat Suatu Akta Notaris. Jurnal Lex Privatum. Volume III Nomor 1. 2015.

Erina Permatasari. Lathifah Hanim. Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Badan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Sistem Online. Jurnal Akta. Volume 4 Nomor 3 September 2017.

Ince Haerisa. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Jabatan. Tesis Hukum. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin 2021.

Mochamad Elmo. Amin Purnawan. Peran Notaris Dalam Transaksi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Lokasi Pembangunan Komplek Perkantoran Pemerintah Kabupaten Sekadau. Jurnal Akta. Vol 5 No 1 March 2018.

Mudofir Hadi. Pembatalan Isi Akta Notaris Dengan Putusan Hakim Jurnal Varia Peradilan. Tahun VI Nomor 72.

Ndaru Satrio. Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Memberikan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Otentik Sebagaimana Dimaksud Dalam Pasal 266 Ayat (1). Jurnal LEX Certa . Volume 1 Nomor 1 2016.

Paulus Efendi Lotulung. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum dalam Menjalankan Tugasnya.Media Notariat. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Edisi April. 2002.

Putri. C. A.. Gunarto. Efektivitas Pengecekan Sertifikat Terhadap Pencegahan Sengketa Tanah Dalam Proses Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Akta. Vol. 5. Nomor (1) Tahun 2018.

Rita Permanasari. Akhmad Khisni. Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia . Jabatan. Jurnal Akta. Volume 5 Nomor 2 March 2018.

Syarifah Lia. Lathifah Hanim. Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Timbulnya Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (Shm) Atas Tanah (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pertanahan/Agraria dan Tata Ruang Kota Pontianak). Jurnal Akta. Vol. 4. No. 1. March 2017: 33 – 36. Unissula. Semarang.

Books:

Habib Adjie. (2009). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap Undang-Undang Jabatan Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Lilik Mulyadi. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Nico. (2003). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. Center for Documentation and Studies of Business Law. Yogyakarta.

Shidarta. (2006). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Regulation:

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Civil Code

Criminal Code

Decision Number 90/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/PN Smg

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2021 concerning Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.

Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to the Law concerning the Position of Notary.

Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2011 concerning Management of the Study and Handling of Land Cases.

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020 concerning Handling and Settlement of Cases and jurisprudence.

Supreme Court Regulation Number 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of Government Administrative Disputes.

Internet:

www.grobongankab.bps.go.id

www.grobogan.go.id/

https://www.bulog.co.id/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.