Juridical Analysis of the Use of Barcodes in Notarial Deeds in Order to Improve Security Aspects

Kharisma Adelia Riqoyani

Abstract


This study aims to determine and examine the position of notarial deeds in relation to the use of barcodes in order to improve security aspects, and to determine and examine the legal consequences of the use of notarial deed barcodes in order to improve security aspects. The research approach method is normative juridical. The research specifications are descriptive analytical. Data sources consist of primary data, secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, and tertiary data. Data collection techniques are in the form of literature studies using library research techniques. Then all data is analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of the study indicate that the legal analysis of the use of barcodes in notarial deeds in order to improve security aspects: First, the position of notarial deeds in relation to the use of barcodes in order to improve security aspects is that as long as notarial deeds that use barcodes do not change, replace, and do not add words that can lead to other interpretations with the substance of the head of the deed, the contents of the deed, and the closing of the deed, it means that it is valid. Second, the legal consequences of the use of barcodes in notarial deeds in order to improve security aspects are that there are no prohibitions, so that the purpose of securing notarial deeds can be carried out properly and correctly as long as they do not conflict with the UUJN.

Keywords: Barcode; Deed; Security.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rachmad Budiono, C. (2019). Konseptualisasi dan Peluang Cyber Notary dalam Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 32.

Adjie, H. (2017). Penafsiran Tematik Hukum Notaris Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris Jilid 2. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ali, A. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Jakarta: Toko Gunung Agung.

Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2018). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fitriani Ahlan Sjarif, K. (2022). Efektivitas Sistem Barcode dalam Penanganan Akta Autentik. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 164.

I.A. Budhivaya, H. (2018). Keabsahan Pemberian Barcode pada Minuta Akta dan Salinan Akta Notaris. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 4(2), 108.

Makarim, E. (2015). Keauntetikan Dokumen Publik Elektronik dalam Administrasi Pemerintahan dan Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan(11), 52.

Mertokusumo, S. (1998). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Nurita, R. E. (2012). Cyber Notary Pemahaman Awal Dalam Konsep Pemikiran. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Otto, J. M. (2006). Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir. Bandung: PT Revika Aditama.

Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Sudaryanto, A. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Setara Press.

Wulandari, Y. S. (2018, Desember). Perlindungan Hukum bagi konsumen terhadap Transaksi Jual Beli E-Commerce. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2, 200.

Zinatun Rossalina, e. (2020). Keabsahan Akta Notaris yang Menggunakan Cyber Notary sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, 19.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.