Validity of Notarial Deeds that are Not Read by the Notary in Front of the Participants and Witnesses When Signing the Deed

Diyah Retno Sari, Jawade Hafidz

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the validity of notarial deeds signed without being read out before the parties and witnesses and to identify obstacles and solutions related to the legal consequences arising from the problem. This study applies a normative legal method to assess the validity of notarial deeds that are not read out in front of the relevant parties during signing. This approach relies on laws and regulations, jurisprudence, and other legal sources. Data were obtained through literature studies, including official documents and legal literature. The analysis was conducted prescriptively to evaluate the legal status of notarial deeds and provide recommendations regarding legal compliance in notarial practices in Indonesia. The legal validity of a notarial deed depends on the fulfillment of formal requirements according to the law, including the reading procedure involving the notary, the person appearing, and witnesses. If these procedures are violated, the deed may lose its authentic status, and the notary may face sanctions. Solutions to this problem include compliance with the Notary Law, providing copies of draft deeds to related parties, and increasing the professionalism and supervision of the Notary Supervisory Board. By complying with these regulations, the rights of all parties and the validity of the deed will be guaranteed.

Keywords: Legal; Notary; Procedure; Sanctions; Validity.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Adjie, Habib, 2009, Meneropong Khasanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia (Kumpulan tulisan Tentang Notaris dan PPAT), Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Arliman S, Laurensius, 2015, Notaris dan penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim, Deepublish, Sleman.

Hadikusuma, Hilman, 1995, Metode Pembuatan Kertas Kerja atau Skripsi Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

M, Hajar, 2015, Model-Model Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum dan Fiqh, UIN Suska Riau, Pekanbaru.

Margono, 2019, Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan dan Kepastia Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim, Cetakan Pertama, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, 2015, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Cetakan Ke-3, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Tan Thong Kie, Study Notariat (Serba-serbi Praktek Notaris) Buku II, P.T. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.

Journals:

https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/teori-kepastian-hukum/

I Wayan Arya Kurniawan, 2018, Tanggungjawab Notaris Atas Akta yang Tidak Dibacakan Dihadapan Para Penghadap, Jurnal Akta, Volume 3 No. 3.

Brilian Pratama, Happy Warsito & Herman Adriansyah, 2022, “Prinsip Kehati-hatian Dalam Membuat Akta Oleh Notaris”, Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 11, No. 1, hal. 24-33.

Sailendra. 2015, Pengertian Standar Operasional Prosedur Menurut Para Ahli, https://www.jurnal.id/id/blog/2017-mengenal-manfaat-cara-pembuatandan-contoh-sop/

Riadi, Muchlisin, 2021, Pengertian, Tujuan, Fungsi dan Manfaat SOP. https://www.kajianpustaka.com/2016/10/pengertian-tujuan-fungsi-dan-manfaat-sop.html#google_vignette

Tesis:

Mega Fitria Izzawati, , 2014, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris Yang Tidak Dibacakan Di Hadapan Para Pihak”, Tesis: Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Legislation:

Civil Code

Criminal Code

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 02 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions (UUJN)

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions (UUJN)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.