Paradigm Shift Regarding The Meaning of Appearing Before a Notary in The Cyber Notary Context
Abstract
Abstract. Paradigm shift can refer to a fundamental change in the form of perspective, mindset, or conceptual framework used to understand, explain, or solve a problem. The essence of cyber notary itself can be interpreted as a notary who carries out his duties or authority based on information technology, this is not only the legality of using a cell phone for communication between a notary and his client but also relates to the duties and functions of a notary, especially in making deeds. This study uses a normative legal research method. The approach methods in this study are the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the theoretical approach. The data sources used in this study are secondary data sources, while the data analysis used is prescriptive data analysis. The results of this study are First, regarding the paradigm shift regarding the meaning of appearing before a notary in the context of cyber notary, it cannot be described in detail and in detail how the shift takes place because the Notary Law, the Civil Code itself has not regulated the existence of digital face-to-face in the concept of cyber notary, so it can only be described roughly regarding the use of video teleconferences such as zoom, cameras, cell phones, CCTV but it is emphasized that the parties must remain present. Second, regarding legal certainty regarding deeds made in the cyber notary concept, it can be seen that there is no legal certainty because the Notary Law does not regulate notaries working as cyber notaries.
Keywords: Cyber Notary; Facing Digitally; Paradigm Shift.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journal:
Apriandy Iskandar Dalimunthe, Achmad Fitrian dan Mardi Candra, 2023. “Sinkronisasi Pasal 1868 KUH Perdata dalam Menunjang Terselenggaranya Konsep Cyber Notary di Indonesia” Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge (JIRK), No. 3, Vol. 3, hal 708.
Dian Cita Sari, Wahyudin Purba, & Mufarizuddin Hasibuan, 2019, “Inovasi pendidikan lewat transformasi digital.” Jurnal Yayasan Kita Menulis, Volume 2 Nomor 1, hal. 17-25.
Endra Mayendra, 2022. “Peran Notaris dan Konsultan Hukum dalam Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif”, Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, No. 2, Vol. 6, hal 961.
Ias Muhlashin, 2021. “Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia”, Jurnal Al-Qadau, No. 1, Vol.8, hal. 88.
Kerina Maulidya Putri, Ichsan Anwary dan Diana Haiti, 2022. “Kewajiban Notaris Melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak Secara Bersama- Sama.” Notary Law Journal, No. 2, Vol. 1, hal 159.
Komang Ayuk Septianingsih, Nyoman Putu Budiarta dan Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, 2020. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata” Jurnal Analogi Hukum, No. 3, Vol. 2, hal. 337.
M. Muslih, 2017. “Negara Hukum Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum)”, Jurnal Legalitas, No. 1, Vol. 4, hal. 141.
Putra Arya, Aju Putrijanti, dan Mujiono Hafidh, 2021. “Sinkronisasi Pasal 1868 KUH Perdata dalam Menunjang Terselenggaranya Konsep Cyber Notary di Indonesia”, Jurnal Notarius, No. 2, Vo. 14, hal 612.
Siti Halilah dan Mhd. Fakhrurrahman Arif, 2021. “Asas Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli”, Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, No. 2, Vol. 4, hal. 57.
Widianti, F. D, 2022. “Dampak globalisasi di negara Indonesia.” JISP (Jurnal Inovasi Sektor Publik),Volume 2 Nomor 1, hal. 73-95.
Book:
Djuaeka, D., dan Devi Rahayu, 2019, Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Scopindo, Surabaya, hal 18.
Eddy Army, 2020, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Praktik Peradilan. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, hal 55
Juniarso Ridwan & Ahmad Sodik Sudrajat, 2020, Hukum administrasi Negara dan kebijakan pelayanan publik. Nuansa Cendekia, Bandung, hal 47.
Muhammad, A, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, hal 37.
Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, Hal. 34.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.