Analysis of Proportional Reasoning Task in Task Series Book MANDIRI Grade VII

Ahmad Lutfi, Mochamad Abdul Basir, Imam Kusmaryono, Dyana Wijayanti

Abstract


This study aims to determine the distribution of the percentage of proportional reasoning tasks in the comparison chapter in task series book MANDIRI (Mengasah Kemampuan Diri) Mathematics Grade VII Curriculum 2013, Revised Edition, 2016 Publisher Erlangga, written by Kurniawan. This research is a qualitative research using a descriptive approach. The task data from the book are documented and then analyzed based on indicators from each level of proportional reasoning. The tasks in the comparison chapter consist of two types of tasks, namely multiple choice tasks and essay tasks. There are 225 tasks in the comparison chapter. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the distribution of tasks based on the level of proportional reasoning found that tasks with level 1 (qualitative) were 31 (13.78%), tasks with level 2 (additive) were 22 items (9.78%), tasks with level 3 (pre-multiplicative) were 116 tasks (51.56%), tasks with level 4 (implicit multiplicative) were 24 items (10.67%) and tasks with level 5 (multiplicative) were32 items (14.22%).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustyaningrum, N., Hanggara, Y., Husna, A., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudii, A. (2019). An analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning ability on abstract algebra course. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 2800–2805.

Basir, M. A. (2015). Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Unissula, 3(1), 106–114.

Fitrianawati, M. (2017). Peran analisis butir soal guna meningkatkan kualitas butir soal, kompetensi guru dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan PGSD UMS & HDPGSDI Wilayah Jawa, 282–295.

Herdiansyah, H. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosioal. Salemba Humanika.

Irawati, T. N. (2015). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Guru Matematika DalamMembuat Soal Penalaran ProporsionalSiswa SMP. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015, 1011–1106.

Irawati, T. N. (2016). Pengembangan Paket Tes Kemampuan Penalaran Proposional Siswa SMP. Universitas Jember.

Johar, R., Yusniarti, S., & Saminan. (2018). The analysis of proportional reasoning task in the Indonesian mathematics textbook for the junior high school. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.4145.55-68

Kusumawardani, D. R., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Pentingnya Penalaran Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (PRISMA), 588–595. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012). Using Student Reasoning to Inform the Development of Conceptual Learning Goals: The Case of Quadratic Functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(2), 85–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.656362

Lutfi, A., Basir, M. A., & Kusmaryonno, I. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes penalaran proporsional materi perbandingan berdasarkan taksonomi anderson. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sultan Agung 2 (Sendiksa 2), 2(1), 169–176.

Misnasanti, Utami, R. W., & Suwanto, F. R. (2017). Task based learning to improve proportional reasoning of students in mathematics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995129

OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework. https://pisa2021-maths.oecd.org/#Mathematical-Reasoning

Rizta, A., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2013). Pengembangan Soal Penalaran Model Timss Matematika Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1697

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit ALfabeta.

Sukirwan, Darhim, D., & Herman, T. (2018). Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012036

Top Brand Award. (2019). Bagaimana Penilaian Bagi Merek Dalam Survei Top Brand? https://www.topbrand-award.com/tentang-top-brand-award/

Tutik, S. (2012). Pengembangan Modul pada Materi Segi Empat untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP Berdasarkan Pendekatan Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Wijayanti, D., & Winslow, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/kontinu.6.1.64-82

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Lutfi, Mochamad Abdul Basir, Imam Kusmaryono, Dyana Wijayanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kontinu diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidkan (FKIP), Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Unissula).

Contact us: GKB Lantai 2, FKIP Unissula Jl. Raya Kaligawe Km.4 Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, Semarang 50112. Email: kontinu.pendmat@unissula.ac.id