Comparison of the Implementation of the Death Penalty Against Perpetrators of Corruption Crimes as an Extraordinary Crime Based on Legislation in Indonesia and Other Countries
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to be able to find out the application of the death penalty against perpetrators of corruption in other countries and to conduct a study of the existing laws in Indonesia, whether the death penalty is implemented against perpetrators of corruption, whether there is conflict or not. The death penalty is classified as an extraordinary crime. This research uses normative legal research methods. This research is descriptive in nature. The analysis technique used is a description technique and the collection of legal materials used is literature study. This research uses an approach to statutory regulations (statue approach) to conduct a review of existing regulations. Making this journal takes a comparative approach. This approach is carried out as a comparison of existing arrangements in Indonesia with existing arrangements in other countries. The result of writing this journal is that there are differences in the regulations for applying the death penalty to perpetrators of corruption in Vietnam and Thailand, where there is a specified amount for corruption so that the threat given is the death penalty. Meanwhile, in Indonesia there is no specified amount of corruption proceeds so that corruptors can be sentenced to death. Another thing that influences the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia is that there are regulations in Indonesia that conflict with the death penalty.
Keywords
References
Anjar, Warih, “Penerapan Pidana Mati Terhadap Terpidana Kasus Korupsi”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 4, 2020: 432-442 DOI: 10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.432-442.
Ayu, Eza Tiara, 2016, “Pengaturan Hukuman Mati Dibeberapa Negara (Studi Kasus Di Negara Islam dan Non-Islam)”, Skripsi, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
Dewi, Ni Komang Ratih Kumala, “Keberadaan Pidana Mati Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)”, Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6, no. 1, 2020: 104-114DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v6i1.23444.
Hamenda, Veive Large, “Tinjauan Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia”, Lex Crimen 2, no. 1, 2013: 113-119. DOI: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/1003/816.
Kasiyanto, H. Agus, Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pada Proses Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa, Jakarta, Prenada Media, 2018.
Krisnawati, N., and Suatra Putrawan, “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Secara Massal Di Mesir Ditinjau Dari Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional”, Jurnal Kertha Negara 3, no. 3, 2015: 1-5DOI: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/15201/10062.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Marbun, Roy Ganda, Ida Lamsihar Sitompul, Midarmi Halawa, Indah Prihatiani Malau Pasa, and Ganesha Putra Purba, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Extraordinary Crime”, Jurnal Ilmiah Simantek 4, no. 3, 2020: 234-243 DOI: https://simantek.sciencemakarioz.org/index.php/JIK/article/view/184/161
Pratama, Widhy Andrian, “Penegakan Hukum Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana”, SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1, 2019: 29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34.
Purba, Elizabeth, “Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Berbagai Negara Yang Menerapkan Hukuman Mati (Indonesia, Cina, dan Thailand)”, Jurnal Mahupiki 1, no. 4, 2018: 1-28 DOI: https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1433357.
Rahardian, Randi, 2016, “Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Mati Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia”, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Rahim, Abdur, Asruddin Azwar, Muhammad Hafiz, and Satrio Wirataru, Hukuman Mati Problem Legalitas & Kemanusiaan, Malang, Intrans Institute, 2015.
Setiawan, Dodik Nur Heriyanto, Huang Gui, 2016, “Death Penalty Legislation In China And Indonesia Under International Human Rights Law Prespective, Faculty Of Law, Islamic University Of Indonesia; Faculty Of Law”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, University Of Debrecen And Minzu University Of China, Vol. 23, No. 4, 23 Oktober, diterjemahkan oleh Google Translate.
Sidauruk, Bornok Mariantha, “Prospek Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia”, Universitas Negeri Semarang: Skripsi Program Studi Hukum, 2011: 1-122. DOI: http://lib.unnes.ac.id/id/eprint/1467.
Soge, Paulinus, “Tinjauan Yuridis Eksekusi Pidana Mati Di Indonesia”, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 3, 2012: 94-104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v1i3.10092.
Wardani, Koko Arianto, and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, “Kebijakan Formulasi Hukuman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah 12, no. 4, 2017: 951-958 DOI: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jhku/article/view/2571/1928.
Wicaksono, Setiawan, “Hambatan Dalam Menerapkan Pasal 6 Konvenan Internasional Tentang Hak-Hak Sipil Dan Politik Sebagai Dasar Penghapusan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia”, Pandecta Research Law Journal 11, no. 1, 2016: 65-79 DOI: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/6682/4992.
Widodo, Eddyono Supriadi, Politik Kebijakan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia Dari Masa Ke Masa, Jakarta, Tim Institute Criminal Justice Reform, 2017.
Yanto, Oksidelfa, “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Keadaan Tertentu (Death Penalty To Corruptors In a Certain Condition)”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 1, 2017: 49-56. DOI: http://eprints.unpam.ac.id/id/eprint/6099.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
