The Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Efforts to Realize Restorative Justice
Abstract
The aim of this research is to determine and analyze the role of the Prosecutor's Office in efforts to realize Restorative Justice. In this writing the author uses a normative juridical method with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. The existence of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 is a form of embodiment of progressive resolution of criminal cases where law enforcement is not just the black and white words of the regulations (according to the letter), but according to the spirit and deeper meaning (to very meaning) of a statute or law in a broad sense. The prosecutor's authority to stop prosecution based on restorative justice is a breakthrough in resolving criminal acts. The Prosecutor's Office issued Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The role of the Public Prosecutor is no longer limited to transferring cases to court but can act as a mediator between the parties involved in the case. If the parties to the case have found an agreement and have fulfilled the requirements in Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020, the Public Prosecutor can terminate the prosecution and release the defendant from prison.
Keywords
References
Andi Hamzah, (1984), Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia
Edmon Makarim, (2007), Kompilasi hukum Telematika, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta
Eva Achjani Zulfa, (2010), Gugurnya Hak Menuntut: Dasar Penghapus, Peringan, dan Pemberat Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia
Lilik Mulyadi, (2007), Hukum Acara Pidana Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik Dan Permasalahannya, PT. Alumni, Bandung
Marlina, (2010), Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Pidana, Medan: USU Press
Muladi, (2012). Implementasi Pendekatan “Restorative Justice” Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jakarta: IKAHI
Rufinus Hutahuruk, (2013), Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif Suatu Terobosan Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Ahmad Faizal Azhar, (2019). Penerapan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia, Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4 (2)
Anirut Chuasanga and Ong Argo Victoria, (2019), Legal Principles Under Criminal Law in Indonesia Dan Thailand, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1)
Ardilafiza, (2010), Independensi Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Penuntutan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Pusat Kajian Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Univeristas Bengkulu, Jurnal Konstitusi, III (2)
Henny Saida Flora, (2018), Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, UBELAJ, 3 (2)
Kristian & Christine Tanuwijaya, (2015), Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu di Indonesia, Jurnal Mimbar Justitia, 1 (02)
Nefa Claudia Meliala, (2015). Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Melibatkan Partisipasi Korban dan Pelaku Secara Langsung Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Hukum Unpar, 3 (1)
Sri Praptini, Sri Kusriyah, and Aryani Witasari, (2019), Constitution and Constitutionalism of Indonesia, Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2 (1)
Usman H, (2011). Analisis Perkembangan Teori Hukum Pidana, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 2 (1)
Zainudin Hasan, (2021), Penghentian Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan sebagai Implementasi Peraturan Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Justice, JHM, 2 (1)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.1.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
