JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DEBTORS WHO MAKE DEFECTS OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS WITH COLLEGE GUARANTEES
Abstract
The aim of this research is to examine and analyze legal protection for debtors who default on credit agreements with collateral rights. Credit by banks is given to anyone who has the ability to repay on condition of a debt and receivable agreement between the creditor and debtor. The credit agreement made by the bank to the debtor is a very important aspect in providing credit. Every credit that has been approved and agreed upon between the credit provider and the credit recipient must be stated in the form of a credit agreement. A credit agreement is a bond between a creditor and a debtor whose contents determine and regulate the rights and obligations of both parties in connection with the provision of credit. This research uses a normative juridical approach method, with analytical descriptive research specifications. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained from library research, which was then analyzed qualitatively. The legal protection that a debtor can provide if he defaults is that the debtor can file a lawsuit against the object of his mortgage right in the implementation of the execution auction that will be carried out by the creditor against the collateral object. Obstacles and solutions for debtors, injustice in the auction for the execution of mortgage objects often occurs because creditors ignore the rights of debtors as owners of collateral objects, so besides debtors can file lawsuits, the law must also be updated to ensure more legal certainty for debtors who enter into agreements credit with collateral.
Keywords
References
Badriyah Harun, 2010, Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Bermasalah, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta.
Frieda Husni Hasbullah, 2008, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Jilid 2, Ind-Hil Co, Jakarta.
Gunawan Widjaja dan Ahmad Yani, 2000, Jaminan Fidusia, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
H.R. Daeng Naja, 2005, Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi, The Bankers HandBook, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
M. Bahsan, 2007, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, Raja Grafinfo, Jakarta.
R. Subekti, 1979, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta,.
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti dan Leonora Bakarbessy, 2013, Hukum Jaminan, Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan, Revka Petra Media, Surabaya.
JURNAL
Alvin Riza Subakti, 2015, Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Yang Objeknya Dikuasai Oleh Pihak Ketiga (Studi Putusan No. 326/Pdt/2015/Pt.Smg), Jurnal Verstek Vol.6 No.2
Dewi Kurnia Putri, Amin Purnawan, 2017, Perbedaan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas Dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tidak Lunas, Jurnal Akta, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Vol. 4.
Sugiyono, Heru, 2017, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemilik Jaminan Ketika Tidak Dilaksanakannya Prinsip Kehati -Hatian Oleh Bank Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Memakai Jaminan. Jurnal Yuridis Vol. 4 No. 1. h. 98-109.
LEGISLATION:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia;
Civil Code (KUHPerdata);
Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.
Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees
WEBSITE:
https://www.simulasikredit.com/tips-reschedule-kredit- macet-kta/ diakses pada tanggal 24 Agustus 2024, pukul 12.21 Wib.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.3.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: