Juridical Analysis of Disparity in Case Costs Against Defendants Sentenced to Life Imprisonment

Enggar Wicaksono

Abstract


This writing aims to understand and analyze the court costs of defendants who are sentenced to life imprisonment by the court. On the one hand, in the Criminal Procedure Code, defendants who are sentenced are obliged to pay a fine, whereas in Semester 1 of 2017, defendants who are sentenced to life imprisonment, Court fees are borne by the state. The writing of this legal thesis is entitled "Judicial Analysis of the Disparity in Charges of Case Fees for Defendants Sentenced to Life Imprisonment" which aims to find out the basis for the Judge's consideration of the disparity in Decisions between the first Decision at the Barabai District Court and the Appeal Decision at the Banjarmasin High Court, and to look for a formulation ideal for the imposition of court costs imposed by the Judge on the Defendant who was sentenced to life imprisonment. The approach method used in this research is the nomative juridical approach method. Nomative juridical, namely legal research that uses secondary data sources, is carried out by emphasizing and adhering to juridical aspects, normative legal research is library research, namely research on secondary data. Research problems are analyzed using punishment theory, legal system theory and justice theory. The results of the research show that the implementation of the imposition of court costs against defendants who are sentenced to life imprisonment must be in accordance with applicable legal norms and in accordance with justice for the defendant and society. So that the imposition of case costs imposed on the Defendant who is sentenced to life imprisonment is not detrimental and burdensome for the Defendant.


Keywords


Court; Defendant; Fees; Lifetime.

References


Journals:

Andri Winjaya Laksana, “Tinjauan Hukum Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahguna Narkotika Dengan Sistem Rehabilitasi”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume II No.1 Januari-April 2015.

Muslihin Rais, Nilai Keadilan Putusan Hakim Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Al Daulah Rumah Jurnal UIN Alauddin, Vol.6/No. 1/Juni 2017.

Books:

Dr. Lilik Mulyadi, Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Umum dan Khusus, Alumni, Jakarta

Fitri Wahyuni, 2017, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, PT Nusantara Persada Utama, Tangerang Selatan, 2017

Moeljatno, 2009, asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Rineka Cipta

Sholehudin, 2004, Sistem sanksi Dalam Hukum Pidana: Ide Dasar Double Track system dan Implementasinya, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Sudarto, 1990, Hukum Pidana I, Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dipoengoro

Regulation :

Criminal Code

Criminal Procedure Code

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power

Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of the Formulation of the Results of the 2017 Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting

Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia to the heads of High Courts throughout Indonesia No. KMA/155/X/1981 dated 19 October 1981 in conjunction with Letter from the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. SE-MA/17 of 1983 dated 8 December 1983

Etc:

https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17756&menu=2




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: