The Function of the Prosecutor's Office in Realizing Restorative Justice at the Prosecution Stage

Hariawan Sutaryo

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to find out, study and analyze the position of the Prosecutor's Office in implementing restorative justice in the prosecution mechanism. The determination of termination of prosecution based on restorative justice aims to transfer imprisonment for perpetrators of criminal acts in accordance with the policy in terms and conditions regulated in Perja Number 15 of 2020. The problem of legal effectiveness and criminal quality using the method of implementing termination of prosecution based on restorative justice, is that the Attorney General is prosecuted. to resolve the number of cases that fall within the Perja qualification for termination of prosecution based on restorative justice and at the same time to find the material truth in a criminal case as consideration for granting termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. Attorney General's Regulation 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution based on Restorative Justice is a legal product of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office that is eagerly awaited by the public. With the existence of Attorney General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, prosecutors in Indonesia no longer need to hesitate to close small cases because legally, prosecutorial authority is the domain of the public prosecutor.


Keywords


Justice; Prosecution; Restorative.

References


Howard Zehr. (1990), Changing lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice, Waterloo: Herald Press

Marlina, (2010), Pengantar Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Pidana, Medan: USU Press

R.M. Surachman dan Andi Hamzah, (1996), Jaksa Di Berbagai Negara, Peranan dan Kedudukannya, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Romli Atmasasmita, (1996), Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Eksistensialisme Dan Abolisionisme, Penerbit Putra A.Bardin, Bandung

Tony Marshall. (1999), Restorative Justice : An Overview, London: Home Office Research Developmentand Statistic Directorate

Azwad Rachmat Hambali, (2019), Penerapan Diversi terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13 (1)

Fauzan Azmi, dkk. (2023), Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyerobotan Tanah (Studi Penelitian di Kejaksaan Negeri Aceh Tengah). CENDEKIA: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial & Humaniora, 1, (3)

Klimah Dinda Indiyani Adiesta, (2022), Penerapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Inovasi Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan, Interdiciplinary Journal, 2 (2)

Muhammad Zainuddin, dkk. (2022), Politik Hukum Restorative Justice dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Semarang Law Review (SLR). 3 (1)

Septian Nanang Pangestu, and Lathifah Hanim. (2021), The Role of Prosecution Related to Prosecutor's Demand in Enforcing the Criminal Action of Narcotics. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4 (1)

Sumaryono and Sri Kusriyah, (2020), The Criminal Enforcement of the Fraud Mode of Multiple Money (Casestudy Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora). Jurnal Daulat Hukum: 3 (1)

Sulistiyawan Doni Ardiyanto, Eko Soponyono, and Achmad Sulchan, Judgment Considerations Policy in Decree of the Court Criminal StatementBased On Criminal Destination, Jurnal Daulat Hukum: 3 (1), (2020)

Zainudin Hasan, (2021), Penghentian Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan sebagai Implementasi Peraturan Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Justice, JHM, 2 (1)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: