THE URGENCY OF ARRANGEMENT REGARDING ILLICIT ENRICHMENT IN INDONESIA IN ORDER TO ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMES BY CORPORATIONS

Hamdan Rampadio, Ana Fauzia, Fathul Hamdani

Abstract


Along with the times, the motives or concept of corruption are increasingly complex and growing, as well as the increasing number of transnational crimes, it makes the world need regulations regarding illicit enrichment in legal products at the level of law to allow the imposition of legal sanctions for these crimes, including Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the practice of illicit enrichment in Indonesia and its comparison with other countries, as well as an analysis of the urgency of regulating illicit enrichment in Indonesian law as one of the most important norms in efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. In this study, the method used is normative juridical using a statutory, conceptual and case approach. From the results of the study, an idea that is presented in efforts to develop and reform law in Indonesia, namely in the context of eradicating corruption. This idea is discussed in more depth through a number of concrete cases that have been processed in Indonesia which shows that if we have illicit enrichment norms, the handling of these cases will be maximized. Through this regulation related to illicit enrichment, of course, it can prevent public officials (corporations) from committing corruption, minimizing initiatives to do business or other activities that are full of conflicts of interest (with their positions).

Keywords


Illicit Enrichment; Corruption Eradication; Legal Reconstruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achir Nauli Gading Harahap, Penjatuhan Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh atau Atas Nama Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia, Tesis, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2018.

African Union, African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption, 2003.

Alvon Kurnia Palma, et al., Implementasi & Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment (Peningkatan Kekayaan Secara Tidak Sah) di Indonesia, PolicyPaper: Indonesia Corruption Watch, Edisi Maret 2014.

Ana Fauzia and Fathul Hamdani, Analysis of the Implementation of the Non Conviction-Based Concept in the Practice of Asset Recovery of Money Laundering Criminal Act in Indonesia from the Perspective of Presumption of Innocence, Jurisprudence, Vol. 11, No. 1, (Juni 2021).

Ana Fauzia and Fathul Hamdani, Legal Development Through the Implementation of Non-Conviction Based Concepts in Money Laundering Asset Recovery Practices in Indonesia, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR 2021), Atlantis Press, Vol. 592, (2021).

Ana Fauzia and Fathul Hamdani, Pembaharuan Hukum Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi melalui Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol. 3, No. 7, (2022).

Ana Fauzia, Deva Gama Rizky Octavia, & Fathul Hamdani, The Conflict of the Norms in the Execution of Secured Objects Which are Enforced by Liability Rights When the Debtor is Bankrupt, Progressive Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 1 (April 2022),

Ana Fauzia, Fathul Hamdani, & Deva Gama Rizky Octavia, The Revitalization of the Indonesian Legal System in the Order of Realizing the Ideal State Law, Progressive Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2021).

Bayu Miantoro, Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment di Indonesia, Jurnal Veritas et Justitia, Vol. 6, No. 1, (2020).

David Fredriek Albert Porajow, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Alternatif Memperoleh Kembali Kekayaan Negara yang Hilang karena Tindak Pidana yang Berkaitan dengan Perekonomian Negara, Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 2013.

Diriba Adugna Tulu, The Practical Significances and Challenges of Assets Disclosure and Registration Law in Combating Illicit Enrichment Crime in Ethiopia, International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, Vol. 5, No. 3, (2020).

Halif, Model Perampasan Aset terhadap Harta Kekayaan Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Jurnal Rechtens, Vol. 5, No. 2, (2016).

July Wiarti, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Langkah untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara (Perspektif Analisis Ekonomi terhadap Hukum), Jurnal UIR Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2017).

Junior Willem John Latumeten, Kekayaan yang Tidak Dapat Dipertanggungjawabkan (Illicit Enrichment) sebagai Salah Satu Cara dalam Memberantas Korupsi, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. 5, No. 2, (2017).

Milda Istiqomah, Kebijakan Formulasi Pengaturan “Illicit Enrichment†Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 23, No. 1, (2016).

Muhammad Yusuf, Implementasi & Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Delik Korupsi, Makalah, Disampaikan dalam National Workshop “Kajian Penerapan UNCAC di Indonesia-Implementasi & Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Delik Korupsi†Jakarta, (2014).

Mukhidin, Hukum Progresif sebagai Solusi Hukum yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 3, (2014).

Noratikah Muhammad Azman Ng & Zainal Amin Ayub, The Illicit Enrichment Law and Financial Disclosure System in Malaysia, International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, Vol. 3, No. 13, (2018).

Novalinda Nadya Putri & Herman Katimin, Urgensi Pengaturan Illicit Enrichment dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi & Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, Vol. 9, No. 1, (2021).

Padil, Karakteristik Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Kajian Hukum & Keadilan IUS, Vol. 4, No. 1, (2016).

Paramita Ersan & Anna Erliyana, Public Corruption and Human Rights for Good Governance in Indonesia, International Journal of Arts and Commerce, Vol. 7, No. 5, (2018).

Rony Saputra, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara Terutama terkait dengan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU PTPK), Jurnal Cita Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, (2015).

Satuan Tugas Pemberantasan Mafia Hukum, Illicit Enrichment: Kriminalisasi Peningkatan Kekayaan yang Tidak Wajar, Edisi Desember, 2011.

United Nation, Review of implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. CAC/COSP/IRG/I/1/1/Add 4, 2012.

Zhanat A. Mamitova, et al., On Certain Aspects of Acts of Corruption Countermeasures, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, (2016).

Books

Fathul Hamdani, 2021, “Eksistensi Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor dalam Konteks Hukum di Era Modern†dalam Achmad Hariri (ed.), Penegakan Korupsi & Pembaharuan Hukum di Indonesia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya Publishing, Surabaya.

Fathul Hamdani, 2021, “Urgensi Penerapan Konsep Non-Conviction Bassed dalam Praktik Asset Recovery TPPU di Indonesia†dalam Idul Rishan, Aroma Elmina Martha, & Dodik Setiawan (ed.), Hukum Sebagai Penggerak Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Herlina Manullang & Riki Yanto Pasaribu, 2020, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, LPPM UHN Press, Medan.

Regulations

The Criminal Procedure Code, Act No. 8 of 1981, LN No. 76 of 1981, TLN No. 3209.

Second Amendment to Act No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Act No. 20 of 2001, LN No. 134 of 2001, TLN No. 4150.

Law on Prevention & Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering, Act No. 8 of 2010, LN No. 122 of 2010, TLN No. 5164.

Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, Act No. 19 of 2019, LN No. 197 of 2019, TLN No. 6409.

Internet

Hukum Online. Lika-Liku Menarik Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Kasus Korupsi. https://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5885f5667b8a1/lika-liku-menarik-pertanggungjawaban-korporasi-dalam-kasus-korupsi/, accessed on 12 July 2021.

Hukum Online. UU Ini Kerap Dipakai Aparat dalam Menjerat Korporasi. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt588548020bfc0/uu-ini-kerap-dipakai-aparat-dalam-menjerat-korporasi, accessed on 9 July, 2021.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Berhasil Jerat Korporasi, KPK Terima Apresiasi. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/berita/berita-kpk/742-berhasil-jerat-koorporasi-kpk-terima-apresiasi, accessed on 10 July, 2021.

Randyka Wijaya. Penyebab KPK Sulit Jerat Kejahatan Korporasi. https://m.kbr.id/nasional/11-2016/penyebab_kpk_sulit_jerat_kejahatan_korporasi/86790.html, accessed on 10 July, 2021.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i2.17625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda sinta base dimension DOAJ
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a