Reading intensively: What do the students really need?
Abstract
Intensive reading plays a great role in enhancing students’ reading comprehension. Effective teaching materials are the best assistance for students. Often, in intensive reading class, lecturers neglected the students’ needs and preferences regarding the reading texts and topics being discussed. The materials only come from the lecturers’ perspectives. This study explores the students' needs and lecturers' perceptions toward the effective teaching materials of intensive reading. A questionnaire, delivered to 71 English Department students who have completed the Reading 1 course, is used for analysing the students' needs and preferences on intensive reading materials. Moreover, two English lecturers who experienced in teaching intensive reading for five years were interviewed to get detailed information about the students' needs and effective materials on intensive reading. The data were then analysed using a quantitative and descriptive qualitative approach. The result showed that the reading materials which offer various genres and topics, lists of new vocabularies, clear explanations about reading and vocabulary skills, as well as complete exercises to test the reading comprehension were viewed proper for both teachers and students. This research finding gives important information to develop effective reading materials for both sides.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrar, M. (2017). Teaching English problems: An analysis of EFL primary school teachers in Kuala Tungkal. The Proceedings of ISIC 2016 Academic Conference, March, 94–101.
Alexander, J. E. (1998). Teaching reading. Scot, Foresman, and Company.
Ali, M. M. (2019). Extensive and intensive reading strategy. https://www.academia.edu/38319415/Extensive_and_Intensive_pdf
Anderson, N. J. (2008). Active skills for reading book 4 (2nd Edition). Heinle Cengage Center.
Andrés, I. C. (2020). Enhancing reading comprehension through an intensive reading approach. HOW Journal, 27(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.518
Brown, D. H. (2000). Teaching by principles. Pearson Education.
Chen, Y. (2021). Comparing incidental vocabulary learning from reading-only and Reading-while-Listening. System, 97, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102442
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). The selection of a research approach. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3-24. http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/55588_Chapter_1_Sample_Creswell_Research_Design_4e.pdf
Egel, I. P. (2009). Learner autonomy in the language classroom: From teacher dependency to learner independency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2023-2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.355
Hariyadi, A., & Yanti, D. R. (2019). The importance of needs analysis in materials development. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 4(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v4i2.88
Hasbaini, H., & Manan, A. (2017). Teaching reading comprehension by using short stories. English Education Journal, 8(3), 404–423. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/8926
Jeong, M., & Kim, J. (2012). Needs analysis and development of teaching materials for elementary English underachievers. English Teaching, 67(3). https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.67.3.201209.365
Küçükoğlu, H. (2013). Improving Reading skills through effective reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 709–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.113
Kuzborska, I. (2011). Teachers’ decision-making processes when designing eap reading materials in a lithuanian university setting. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.07.003
Mart, C. T. (2015). Combining extensive and intensive reading to reinforce language learning. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(4), 85-90. http://www.wjeis.org/FileUpload/ds217232/File/09a.mart.pdf
Mohibu, Y., & Ismail, H. (2021). The Application of the Cooperative Learning Model (Picture and Picture) to Improve the Students’ Reading Skill. Langua: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 4(2), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5540252
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
Ni’mah, D., & Umamah, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted on extensive reading: students’ voices. English Education : Journal of English Teaching and Research, 5(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v5i1.14367
Nimasari, E. P. (2018). An ESP needs analysis: Addressing the needs of english for informatics engineering. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v3i1.1085
Noviyanti, S. D. (2018). Students’ reading preference and its implications: a study of three English education departments in jember. Lingua Scientia, 25(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.23887/ls.v25i2.18826
Odwan, T. A. A.-H. Al. (2012). The effect of the directed reading thinking activity through cooperative learning on English secondary stage students’ reading comprehension in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(16), 138–151. www.ijhssnet.com
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Safaeia, L. A., & Bulca, M. (2013). Extensive reading and creative practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.097
Savage A., & Wiese, D. (2011). Real reading 4: Creating an authentic reading experience. Pearson Education.
Setyowati, H. I., & Sugirin, S. (2020). Developing reading materials based on the student’s multiple intelligence types for junior high school students. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 19(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v20i1.2066
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: an empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64(September 2019), 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821
Sidek, H. M., & Rahim, H. A. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046
Tarchi, C. (2015). Fostering Reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers’ prior knowledge and inference-making skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013
Widodo, H. P. (2009). Key Issues in Teaching EFL/ESL Intensive Reading: A Videotaped Self-Observation Report. Journal of Effective Teaching, 9(3), 38-58. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092128
Yin, L. (2015). The problems and solutions in intensive reading course teaching. Essaeme, 143–147. https://doi.org/10.2991/essaeme-15.2015.32
Yuniarti, & Yulian, R. (2019). Analisis Kebutuhan pengembangan bahan ajar reading pada matakuliah English for children PG PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah Pontianak. Pena Kreatif : Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 6–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/jpk.v7i2.1392
Zhang, L. (2020). Teaching design and practice of intensive reading course based on BOPPPS. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 503. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.21
Zhu, W., & Liu, D. (2014). Study on the theoretical foundation of business English curriculum design based on ESP and needs analysis. Higher Education Studies, 4(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n1p68
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.7.1.16-31
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dzurriyyatun Ni'mah, Fitri Awaliyatush Sholihah
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/