POLITICS AND LAW OF ORGANIZING GENERAL ELECTIONS USING AN OPEN PROPORTIONAL SYSTEM
Abstract
A pure open proportional system was then implemented in the 2014 elections which stipulated that the majority of votes would be the terms and conditions for members of the DPR, Provincial DPRD and Regency/City DPRD to be elected. The political development of electoral law from time to time has experienced significant shifts. Elections are considered a real form of democracy and the most concrete form of community participation in taking part in state administration. This writing aims to understand and analyze the legal politics of holding general elections with a proportional system in Indonesia, the problems and solutions for holding general elections with a proportional system in Indonesia. The approach method used in this research is the normative juridical approach method. Normative juridical emphasizes the aspect of understanding a legal norm which includes research on legal principles, research on legal systematics, research on legal synchronization, legal history research, and comparative legal research. The analytical knife in this writing uses the theory of legal certainty and legal system theory.
The research results show that in the legal politics of holding general elections with a proportional system in Indonesia, the Constitutional Court (MK) emphasized that the Indonesian constitution has never regulated the type of legislative election system (pileg). The problem with holding general elections using a proportional system in Indonesia is that the design of holding an open general election system turns out to be close to the practice of money politics and identity politics. The ideal solution for holding general elections in Indonesia is to implement a mixed proportional system which emphasizes a combination of open and closed proportional systems.
Keywords
References
Journals:
Abd Halim, 2014, “Dampak Sistem Proporsional Terbuka terhadap Perilaku Politik Studi Kasus Masyarakat Sumenep Madura dalam Pemilihan Legislatif 2014”, Jurnal Humanity, Vol. 9 No. 2.
Agung Wibiyanto dan Wahyu Tri Hastiningsih, 2019, “Pengelolaan Isu Pemilihan Umum Presiden Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Pada Media Di Jawa Tengah”, al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, Vol. 4 No. 2.
Agus Riwanto, 2015, “Korelasi Pengaturan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka Berbasis Suara Terbanyak Dengan Korupsi Politik Di Indonesia”, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 4 No.1.
Andreas Daniel Adi Vibhisana, dkk, 2023, “Di Bawah Kontrol Publik: Analisa Kritis Penerapan Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Maupun Tertutup terhadap Peluang Penguatan Konrol Publik Pada Pemilu 2024”, Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, Vol. 5 No. 1.
Aryojati Ardipandanto, 2020, “Dampak Politik Identitas Pada Pilpres 2019: Perspektif Populisme”. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional. Vol. 11 No. 1.
Burhanuddin Muhtadi, 2019, “Politik Uang dan New Normal Dalam Pemilu Paska-Orde Baru,” Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, Vol. 5, No. 1.
Imawan dan Ramadhan, 2021, “Melampaui PolitikUang Studi Kasus Peningkatan Partisipasi Politik DalamPilwako Medan Tahun 2020.”, Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, Vol. 3 No. 2.
Muhammad Revan Fauzano Makarim dan Khairul Fahmi, 2022, “Permasalahan dan Dampak dari Implementasi Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Terbuka terhadap Sistem Politik”, Journal of Social and Policy Issues, Vol. 2 No.2.
Titony Tanjung, 2023, “Mengenal Sistim Proporsional Terbuka Di Indonesia Menuju Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024”, Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, Vol. 2 No. 1.
Books:
Achmad Ali, 2009, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Kencana, Jakarta.
Johny Ibrahim, 2007, Metode dan Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang.
Tjahjo Kumolo, 2015, Politik Hukum Pilkada Serentak, PT Mizan Publika, Bandung.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.3.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in:
