Analyzing Court Decisions on Interfaith Marriage: A Maqasid Sharia Perspective

Allysa Novita Putri*    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Iffatin Nur    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/jua.v6i1.35268
The aim of this research is to analyze court decisions on interfaith marriages, specifically the decisions numbered 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby and 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN. Bla. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach. The data in this study are digital data. The results of this research show differences in the interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The Surabaya District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law as indicating that interfaith marriage is not prohibited. This leads to a legal vacuum that causes judges to use the explanation of Article 35 (a) of the Population Administration Law to permit interfaith marriages and Article 10 paragraph (3) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 to provide a basis for the implementation of interfaith marriages. The Blora District Court's decision interprets Article 2 paragraph (1) to consider the validity of marriage based on the respective religions of the applicants. The analysis results based on the theory of maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jamaluddin Athiyah indicate that the decision from the Surabaya District Court does not show preservation, while the decision from the Blora District Court does show preservation. The analysis based on Islamic legal methodology, maqasid al-shari'ah proposed by Jasser Auda, shows that both decisions do not fully meet the standards of the system approach.

Keywords: Interfaith Marriage, Court Order, Maqasid Shari'ah

  1. Abdurrahman, Zulkarnain. “Teori Maqasid Al-Syatibi Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kebutuhan Dasar Manusia Menurut Abraham Maslow.” Jurnal Ushuluddin: Media Dialog Pemikiran Islam 22, no. 1 (2020): 52–70. https://doi.org/10.24252/jumdpi.v22i1.15534.
  2. Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Media Syari’ah 22, no. 1 (2020): 48. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719.
  3. Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata : Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
  4. Auda, Jasser. “How Do We Realise Maqasid Al-Shariah in the Shariah.” Retrieved June, 2018, 1–26.
  5. Busriyanti. “Maqasid Al-Syari’ah Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Lalu Lintas Di Indonesia.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (2021): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i1.2470.
  6. Busyro. Pengantar Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  7. Cahyani, Tinuk Dwi. Hukum Perkawinan. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2020.
  8. Cantonia, Sindy, Dan Ilyas, and Abdul Majid. “Dan Hak Asasi Manusia (Juridical Review on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia in the Perspective of Marriage Law and Human Rights).” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 6 (2021): 510–27.
  9. Fanindy, Muhammad Nanda. “Formulasi Maqasid Syariah Perspektif Jamaluddin Athiyyah.” Islamitsch Familierecht Journal 1, no. 01 (2020): 23–45. https://doi.org/10.32923/ifj.v1i01.1489.
  10. Ghani, Sulhan Hamid A. “Paradigma Jasser Auda Tentang Maqashid Al Syari’ah.” Jurnal Paradigma 7, no. 1 (2019): 1–28.
  11. Helim, Abdul. Maqasid Syariah versus Ushul Fiqh (Konsep Dan Posisinya Dalam Metodologi Hukum Islam). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.
  12. Hikmiyah, Hawa’ Hidayatul, Ahmad Faisol, and St Sariroh. “Implikasi Larangan Pernikahan Tunagrahita Berat Perspektif Maqosid Shariah Jaser Auda.” Ijlil 1, no. 3 (2021): 236–62. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijl.v1i3.85.
  13. Jalil, Abdul. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan 6, no. 2 (2018): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.56.
  14. Janah, Nasitotul, and Abdul Ghofur. “Maqashid As-Ayariʻah Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Ekonomi Islam.” International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din 20, no. 2 (2018): 167–92. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.20.2.4045.
  15. Listyawati, Peni Rinda, Indah Setyowati, and Latifah Hanim. “LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE REJECTION REGISTRATION INTERFAITH MARRIAGES.” International Jurnal of Law Recontruction 4, no. 2 (2020): 110–23.
  16. M.Yunus, Fakhrurrazi, and Zahratul Aini. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan (Tinjauan Hukum Islam).” Media Syari’ah 20, no. 2 (2020): 138. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v20i2.6512.
  17. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Penetapan Nomor: 1977 K/Pdt/2017 (n.d.).
  18. ———. Penetapan Nomor: 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN Bla. (2017).
  19. ———. Penetapan Nomor: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN SBY (2022).
  20. Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.
  21. Mursalin, Ayub. “Legalitas Perkawinan Beda Agama : Mengungkap Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Di Indonesia.” Undang Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (2023): 113–50. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.6.1.113-150.
  22. Musolli, Musolli. “Maqasid Syariah: Kajian Teoritis Dan Aplikatif Pada Isu-Isu Kontemporer.” AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 5, no. 1 (2018): 60–81. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v5i1.324.
  23. Nandapratiwi, Zalma Afika, Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni, and Andina Elok Puri Maharani. “A Juridical Analysis of Abroad Interfaith Marriage’s Position in Indonesia’s Law.” Interdisciplinary Social Studies 1, no. 10 (2022): 1242–49. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v1i10.230.
  24. Nurcahaya, Mawardi Dalimunthe, Srimurhayati. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Hukum Islam 15, no. 2 (2018): 141–56. https://doi.org/10.54090/mu.19.
  25. Nurlizam, Nurlizam. “Pernikahan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Al-Quran Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ulunnuha 8, no. 2 (2020): 267–90. https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v8i2.1258.
  26. Rosidah, Zaidah Nur, Lego Karjoko, and Mohd Rizal Palil. “The Government’s Role in Interfaith Marriage Rights Protection: A Case Study of Adjustment and Social Integration.” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 3, no. 2 (2023): 265–87. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.105.
  27. Sutantio, Ny Retnowulan dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktek (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2019.
  28. Syarief, Elza. Praktik Peradilan Perdata. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2020.
  29. Tanjung, Albert. “Legalitas Penyelundupan Hukum Pada Perkawinan Beda Agama Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Dan Receptio A Contrario.” National Journal of Law 1, no. 1 (2019): 52.
  30. Turnip, Ibnu. “Perkawinan Beda Agama: Perspektif Ulama Tafsir, Fatwa MUI Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Indonesia.” Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 01 (2021): 116. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v6i01.1337.
  31. Wiguna, Alivermana. Memahami Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Perspektif Khaled M. Abou El Fadl Dan Jasser Auda. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish, 2022.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Allysa Novita Putri, Iffatin Nur
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

ULUL ALBAB: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Department of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
Jl. Kaligawe Ray KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Phone: +62 81359100363
Website: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua
Email: jurnalululalbab@unissula.ac.id

ULUL ALBAB stats

ISSN: 2597-6168 (Print)
ISSN: 2597-6176 (Online)
DOI : 10.30659/jua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps