DISCOURSE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRESSIVE LAW IN RECOVERING STATE LOSSES DUE TO CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION

Yopi Gunawan

Abstract


The number of corruption cases in Indonesia that are not appropriately resolved is the cause of the emergence of progressive laws. Public trust in the law began to fade because the applicable law did not determine many problems. The law is not seen as a solution provider, and it becomes a particular problem for law enforcement. This article aims to analyze the concept of recovering state losses due to corruption through the implementation of progressive law. The method used is normative legal research using a qualitative approach. This article concludes that progressive law enforcement to eradicate criminal acts of corruption lies in harmonizing the values contained in society and then realizing those values into reality, where their application is influenced by several factors, including legal substance, legal structure, culture law, professionalism, and leadership. The development of the modus operandi of corruption in hiding assets resulting from corruption encourages the urgency of implementing a progressive law enforcement strategy by implementing 2 (two) strategic steps, namely: a) Taking rule-breaking actions in the form of seizure of the defendant's assets to guarantee payment of state losses; b) The judge gives a contra legem decision in the form of an obligation to pay replacement money without a subsidiary which is preceded by confiscation of the guarantee so that it will close the defendant's room to escape from paying replacement money

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Sadjipto Rahardjo, (2006), Menggagas Hukum Progresif Indonesia, Pustaka Pelajar, Semarang.

Zainuddin Ali, (2011), Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Journals

A.M. Mujahidin, (2007), Hukum Progresif: Jalan Keluar dari Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia. Varia Peradilan, vol.XXII no.257 edition 2007.

Abdul Fatakh, (2015), Kejahatan Pidana Khusus Korupsi Di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Islam Progresif Dalam Integritas Hukum Nasional. Al-Mizan, vol.11 no.1 edition 2015, pg. 15-32.

Ade Mahmud, (2020), Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, vol.49 no.3 edition 2020, pg. 256-271.

Ahmad Zaenal Fanani, (2010), Hermeneutika Hukum Sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Varia Peradilan, vol. XXV no.297 edition 2010.

Bayu Setiawan, (2018), Penerapan Hukum Progresif Oleh Hakim Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Transendensi. Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, vol.18 no.1 edition 2018, pg. 33-53.

Dey Ravena, (2010), Wacana Konsep Hukum Progresif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, vol.23 no.02 edition 2010, pg. 155-156.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, (2013), Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan. Jurnal Opinio Juris, vol. 13 edition 2013, pg. 2-3.

Efraim Mbomba Reda., I Nyoman Putu Budiartha., I Made Minggu Widyantara, (2020), Konsepsi Hukum Progresif Dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, vol.1 no.2 edition 2020, pg. 35-39.

H.A. Malthuf Siroj., and Ismail Marzuki, (2017), Penegakan Hukum Progresif: Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif. HAKAM, vol.1 no.2 edition 2017, pg. 237-260.

Hwian Christianto, (2011), Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana. Mimbar Hukum, vol.23 no.3 edition 2011, pg. 431-645.

Imelda F.K. Bureni, (2016), Kekosongan Hukum Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, vol.45 no.4 edition 2016, pg. 297.

Ismail Marzuki, (2013), Rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, vol.3 no.1 edition 2013, pg. 199-213.

M. Beni Kurniawan, (2018), Problematika Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Kebijakan Hukum, vol.12 no.2 edition 2018, pg. 138.

M. Syamsudin, (2008), Kecenderungan Paradigma Berfikir Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Media Hukum, vol.15 no.2 edition 2008, pg. 202.

M. Yasin al-Arif, (2019), Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, vol.2 no.1 edition 2019, pg. 169-192.

Muhammad Irwan., Slamet Sampurno Soewondo., and Julianto Jover Jotam Kalalo, (2018), Hukum Progresif Sebagai Paradigma Hukum Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. SOCIETAS: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Sosial, vol.7 no.1 edition 2018, pg. 38-46.

Muliadi, A, (2011), Peran Politik Hukum dalam Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan. Jurnal Hukum Adil, vol.2 no.2 edition 2011.

Nandang Sambas., and Ade Mahmud, (2019), Model Penegakan Hukum Progresif Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Melalui Pidana Uang Pengganti. Lex Lata: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, vol.1 no.2 edition 2019, pg. 140-152.

Romli Atmasasmita, (2012), Tiga Paradigma Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, vol.3 no. 1, edition 2012, pg. 31-32.

Sadjipto Rahardjo, (2005), Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, vol.1 no.1 edition 2005, pg. 1-24.

Yanto Sufriadi, (2010), Penerapan Hukum Progresif dalam Penegakan Hukum di tengah Krisis Demokrasi. Jurnal Hukum, vol.17 no.2 edition 2010, pg. 233-248.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v8i3.15473

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a