THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSPECT'S RIGHTS IN THE LEGALITY OF PRETRIAL INVESTIGATION

Budiyanto Budiyanto, Farida Kaplele, Alwan Hadiyanto

Abstract


The purpose of this study is examine the legality of the investigative process at pretrial hearings and their constraints. The normative legal research method supported by empirical legal research is used in this study. The results of the study found that the suspect's right to test the legality of the investigation process at the pretrial hearing has been implemented through legal procedures in accordance with the provisions of Article 77, Article 79, Article 82 and Article 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In its implementation, out of a total of 40 cases, 15 cases were rejected, 7 cases were granted, 7 cases were withdrawn, 4 cases could not be accepted, 6 cases were declared disqualified, 1 case was still in trial. As a result, it was found that there were procedural errors and violations of rights committed by investigators, so that during the examination the pretrial hearing was declared invalid. Obstacles for a legality test for the investigation process through a pretrial hearing include: the pretrial request was declared invalid, declared unacceptable, the difficulty for the suspect to find legal counsel who could win his case, the high cost of paying attorneys, the suspect's ignorance and ignorance of legal issues.

Keywords


Investigation; Legality; Pretrial;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books:

Ade Saptono, 2009, Pokok-pokok metodologi Penelitian Hukum Empiris Murni Sebuah Alternatif, Penerbit Universitas Tri sakti, Jakarta;

Andi Muhammad Sofyan dan Abd. Asis, 2017, Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar, Kencana, Jakarta;

H.M.A. Kuffal, 2004, KUHAP Dalam Praktik Hukum, UMM Press, Malang;

Luhut M.P Pangaribuan,2013, Hukum Acara Pidana: Surat Resmi Advokat Di Pengadilan Praperadilan, Eksepsi, Pledoi, Duplik, Memori Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Papas Sinar Sinanti, Jakarta;

Jaholden, 2021, Praperadilan dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, CV. AA Rizky, Banten;

M. Yahya Harahap, 2007, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali (Edisi Kedua), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta;

Tolib Effendi, 2014, Dasar-dasar Hukum Acara Pidana Perkembangan dan Pembaharuannya di Indonesia, Setara Press, Malang;

Zulkarnain, 2016, Praktik Peradilan Pidana: Panduan Praktis Memahami Peradilan Pidana, Setara Press, Malang;

Journals:

Andri Winjaya Laksana, Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Volume IV No. 1 January - April 2017;

Ely Kusumastuti, Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Obyek Praperadilan, Yuridika 33, no.1 2018;

Erwin Ubwarin, Irel Sahetapy, Pretrial Dilemma and Main Case Examination, Jurnal Belo, Vol. 8 No. 1 Febuary 2022;

Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Abbas, and Rafika Nur, Limitation of Harbormaster Responsibility in Ship Accidents, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol 10, no. 3 (2021);

Iqbal Parikesit, Eko Soponyono, Sukinta, Tinjauan Tentang Objek Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Diponegoro Law Journal, volume 6, No. 1, 2017;

Lily Bauw, Erni Dwita Silambi, Ibrahim Kama, Nurwita Ismail, Pre-Trial As Investigation Process Control System, SASI, Volume 28 Issue 4, December 2022;

Sri Wulandari, Kajian Tentang Praperadilan Dalam Hukum Pidana, Serat Acitya, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2015;

Sugeng Sutrisno, Pre-Trial in the Criminal Justice System in Military Criminal Judges in Indonesia, International Journal of Business and Social Science Research, Vol: 2, Issue: 11 November 2021;

Sunarto, Nanda Riko Hendy Toerino, Pretrial and Its Contribution To Protection Of The Rights Of Suspectives, International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022);

Tumian Lian Daya Purba, Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Hukum Bagi Tersangka, Papua Law Journal, Vol 1, no. 2 (2018);

Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, Pre-judicial Construction through Judicial Reconstruction of the Jommissioner Judges in order to Protect Rights of Suspects/Defendants in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, Vol. 18 No. 1, March 2018;

Regulation:

Act No. 8 of 1981 Concerning Pretrial Criminal Procedure Code;

Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number: 21/PUU-XII/2014 Regarding Reviewing Act No. 8 of 1981 Concerning Criminal Procedure Code;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v10i1.30577

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Indexed by :

google_scholar onesearch crossref garuda base dimension DOAJ sinta
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum  
Faculty of Law, UnissulaCopyright of Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk,ISSN 2580-3085 (Online) ISSN 2355-0481 (Print)
Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112JPH is licensed under a