Legal Consequences of a House Sale and Purchase Agreement Through a Home Ownership Credit by Over Credit Underhand
Abstract
This study aims to analyze: 1) The legal consequences of a house sale and purchase agreement through a mortgage underhand over credit for the parties. 2) Legal protection for the parties due to an over credit sale and purchase agreement. The approach methods used in this study are the case study approach and the statute approach. This type of research is a normative legal research. The types and sources of data in this study are secondary data obtained through literature studies. The analysis in this study is prescriptive. The results of the study concluded: 1) The legal consequences of a house sale and purchase agreement through a mortgage underhand over credit for the parties carried out with trust in each other, because this trust is not based on applicable law will harm the party who receives the debtor. The loss can be in the form of default. The legal consequence of the default is that the replacement debtor cannot take the certificate that is still in the bank's possession. The replacement debtor cannot change the name, because the certificate is still registered in the name of the first debtor. 2) Legal protection for the parties due to the over credit sale and purchase agreement, namely preventive protection for the buyer can be carried out in the implementation of the sale and purchase agreement by checking the existence of evidence of ownership of land rights that are the object of the agreement. Repressive protection in decision Number 30 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Cbn is by filing a lawsuit with the Court. In this decision, the Plaintiff or buyer asked the Cirebon District Court so that the decision can be used to take the KPR house certificate that is still under the control of the Bank and carry out the name change process. In his decision, the judge stated that the KPR house purchased by the plaintiff was valid and had permanent legal force. The judge also stated that the buyer was a buyer in good faith for the object of the dispute. One of the principles in a sale and purchase agreement is that buyers in good faith must always be protected.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustina, 2023, Perlindungan Konsumen Kpr Bank Syariah Atas Rumah Yang Tidak Sesuai Spesifikasi Dan Gagal Bangun, Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Studies Medan, Volume 4 Nomor 1.
Arifin, J, 2019, Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Wanprestasi Developer Terhadap Bangunan Kpr Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Jurnal Yustitia, Volume 5 Nomor 2.
Bambang Eko Muljono, 2017, Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan, Jurnal Independent, Volume 5 Nomor 1.
Debby Shara, D. H., & Wahjunic, 2019, Hak Bank Sebagai Kreditur Dalam Pemberian Kredit Pemilikan Apartemen Dengan Jaminan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Apartemen, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, Volume 2 Nomor 2.
Lathifah Hanim, MS.Noorman, 2016, Penyelesaian Perjanjian Kredit Bank Sebagai Akibatforce Majeure Karena Gempa di Yogyakarta, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, Faculty of Law, Unissula,Volume III Nomor 2.
Mahfudzotin Nikmah, 2020,Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Jual Beli Rumah Melalui Kredit Pemilikan Rumah, JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), Volume 6 Nomor 1.
Meisha Poetri, 2022, Kekuatan Hukum Akta Di Bawah Tangan Dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Galuh.
Socha Tcefortin Indera Sakti , Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Letterc Di Bawah Tangan ,Jurnal Privat Law, Volume VIII No. 1 Januari-Juni 2020.
Wijayanti, P., Silviana, A., & Ananingsih, S. W, 2017, Akibat Hukum Jual Beli Tanah dan Bangunan Secara di Bawah Tangan Yang Sedang Dibebani Hak Tanggungan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 416/Pdt/G/2015/PN.Smg). Diponegoro Law Journal, volume 6 Nomor 2.
Agus Yudha Hernoko, 2008, Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial, Mediatama, Yogyakarta.
Asikin Zainal, 2012, Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
Dr.Kasmir, 2016, Bank dan Perbankan, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Handri Rahardjo, 2003, Cara Pintar Memilih dan Mengajukan Kredit, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Yustisia.
Herutomo, 2010, Rahasia KPR Yang Disembunyikan Para Bankir,Jakarta, Gramedia.
Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 1994, Aneka Hukum Bisnis, Bandung, Alumni.
Munir Fuady, 1996, Hukum Perkreditan Kontemporer, Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti.
R. Subekti, 2014, Aneka Perjanjian, PT Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Ridwan Khairandy, 2004, Iktikad Baik Dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak, UI Press, Jakarta.
Satjipto Raharjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, PT.Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung .
Sri Soedewi Asjchoen Sofyan, 1974, Hukum Perdata: Hukum Beda, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.v6i1.35852
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review has been indexed in:
