Judge Freedom Versus Accountability on Oversight System and Ethics Enforcement Mechanism in Criminal Justice in Indonesia
Abstract
This study examines the delicate balance between judicial independence and accountability within Indonesia's criminal justice system, focusing on mechanisms of oversight and ethical enforcement. Judicial independence serves as a fundamental pillar in ensuring impartial court decisions; however, it necessitates a robust accountability system to prevent abuses of power and maintain public trust. Using a normative juridical method, this research analyzes the legal framework governing judicial oversight and ethics enforcement mechanisms. Findings suggest that while Indonesia has established institutions such as the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court to oversee judicial conduct, their coordination remains suboptimal. The lack of enforcement power for the Judicial Commission often results in ethical violations not being adequately addressed. Additionally, judges frequently face external pressures, particularly in high-profile cases, which may compromise their independence. This study highlights key challenges, including structural limitations in the supervisory system, public and media influence on judicial decision-making, and insufficient transparency in ethical oversight. To strengthen judicial integrity, the research recommends enhancing the authority of the Judicial Commission, improving inter-institutional coordination, and increasing transparency in judicial accountability processes. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on legal reform in Indonesia and propose strategies to ensure a fairer and more accountable judiciary.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blackstone, W. (2016). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford University Press.
Farabi, M. F. F. (2023). Polemik Legalitas Pemecatan Hakim Konstitusi oleh Lembaga Pengusul: Tinjauan Kasus Pemecatan Hakim Aswanto dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(04), 294–303.
Hamdi, S., & Erick, B. (2024). Sanksi Bughat dan Makar Dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 96–105.
Hazmi, R. M., & Arman, Z. (2023). Tipologi Kewenangan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Menggantikan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Masa Jabatan: Typology of Authority of the House of Representatives to Replace Constitutional Court Judges During their Term of Office. Reformasi Hukum, 27(3), 169–180.
Holili, H., Yunus, M., & Winarto, W. (2024). Kedudukan Yurisprudensi Sebagai Sumber Hukum di Indonesia Sebagai Penganut Sistem Civil Law. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(09), 3718–3726.
Irawan, B. (2019). Institutional Pluralism Sistem Peradilan Indonesia dan Kekuatan Negara di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(3), 237–256.
Maritza, D. F., & Taufiqurokhman, T. (2024). Peranan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Melalui Pengawasan Publik yang Aktif. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 14(1), 71–84.
No, U.-U. (48 C.E.). tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Paradita, S. A., & Triadi, I. (2024). Analisis Perubahan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Konteks Pemilu 2024 Melalui Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara:(Analysis of Changes in the Constitutional Court’s Decision in The Context of the 2024 Elections Through a Review of Constitutional Law). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 13.
Permata, C., & Ali, Z. Z. (2022). Implikasi Asas Personalitas Keislaman Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Muslim dan Non-Muslim di Pengadilan Agama. Dialog, 45(2), 181–194.
Raz, J. (2009). The authority of law: essays on law and morality. Oxford University Press.
Situmorang, C. I., & Triadi, I. (2024). Reformasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia: Meningkat, Independensi, dan Kualitas:(Judicial Power Reform in Indonesia: Improving Independence, Transparency, and Quality). Journal Customary Law, 1(2), 9.
Tambunan, E. M., Sembiring, R. E. B., Gozali, F., & Sianturi, D. M. R. (2024). ANALISIS EKSISTENSI ETIKA HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEWUJUDKAN PERADILAN BERINTEGRITAS DAN AKUNTABEL (PUTUSAN MK NO. 90/PUU-XXI/2023). IBLAM LAW REVIEW, 4(2), 50–61.
Thompson, D. F. (1980). Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review, 74(4), 905–916.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i1.42391
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id