Investigating English language teachers at tertiary level in adopting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Challenges in the 21st century

Yogi Widiawati

Abstract


In this 21st century era, English teachers must have good knowledge of English as well as the skills of using various technology in order to make their teaching-learning process go smoothly. Nowadays, technology is like the primary need in every sector, especially in education sector. English lecturers should be able to adapt with the changes of teaching environment since the use of computers, laptops and other tools are becoming the big necessity in our daily life. There are three things that must be considered; technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. By understanding them, the teaching-learning process will become perfect. This article aims to find the perceptions of TPACK how it helps English lecturers achieve their goals. The data were taken from 3 English language lecturers of three different departments as the respondents. This mini research used descriptive quantitative in which the data were collected through observation and were analysed with data reduction, interpretation, and description. The findings shows that the score for content knowledge (CK) for all teachers ranges 78%-80 %, pedagogical knowledge (PK) ranges 55%-65%, technological knowledge (TK) ranges 60%-75%. Meanwhile score for Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) ranges 77%-82%, Technological Pedagogical Knowledge ranges (TPK) 60%-67%, TPACK 72%-75%. These imply that lecturers of polytechnics are good and skilful to integrate the technology with pedagogic and content knowledge.


Keywords


TPACK; 21st century; English lecturer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alayyar, G. M., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: Support from blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.773

Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007

Drajati, N. A., Rakerda, H., Sulistyawati, H., Nurkamto, J., & Ilmi, M., (2021). Investigating the adoption of TPACK-21CL by English preservice teachers in a covid-19 teaching practicum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Science, 11 (1), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal/v11i1.34625

Koh, J. H. L., (2013). A Rubric to analyze teachers’ conceptions of meaningful learning in ICT lesson planning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887-900. https://doi.org/10/14742/ajet/228

Harits, M., Sujadi., & Slamet. (2019). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledgemath teachers: to develop 21st century skills students. Journal of physics: Conference series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032011

Herold, B., (2016). Technology in Education: An Overview. Education Week 20, 129-141.

Hewitt, J. (2008). Reviewing the handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 8(4), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150802506274

Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2012, March). TPACK research with inservice teachers: Where’s the TCK?. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4704-4709). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/40352/

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J., (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muliasari, D. (2019). The effect of product price and product quality on purchasing decisions for Samsung brand handphones among STIE AAS Surakarta Students. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 3(04).http://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBAR/article/view/805

Oyanagi, W., & Satake, Y., (2016). Capacity building in technological pedagogical content for pre-service teacher. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 10 (1), 33-44. https://jaems.jp/contents/icomej/vol10/5_oyanagi.pdf

Rikarno, R., (2019). Pemanfaatan handhone android sebagai media produksi tutorial pembelajaran seni. Melayu Arts and Performance Journal, 1 (1), 73-87. https://dx.doi.org/10.26887/mapj.v1i1.632.g392

Sanjaya, W., (2013). Penelitian pendidikan: Jenis, metode dan prosedur. Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080.15391523.2009.10782544

Selwyn, N., (2012). Education in a digital world: Global perspective on technology and education. Routldge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108178

Sholihah, M. A., Yuliati, L., & Wartono, W. (2016). Peranan TPACK terhadap Kemampuan Menyusun Perangkat Pembelajaran Calon Guru Fisika dalam Pembelajaran Post-Pack. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 144-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i2.6115

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004

Srisawasdi, N. (2012). The role of TPACK in physics classroom: case studies of preservice physics teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3235-3243.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.043

Sugiyono, (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA

Suyamto, J., Masykuri, M., & Sarwanto, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Tpack (Technolgical, Pedagogical, and Content, Knowledge) Guru Biologi Sma Dalam Menyusun Perangkat Pembelajaran Materi Sistem Peredaran Darah. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41381

Tondeur, J., Aesaert. K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Freayman, N., & Erstad, O., (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure English preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462-472. https://doi.org/10/1111/bjet/12380

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competencies: Implication for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012/668938

Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Penilaian hasil pembelajaran di sekolah. Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.7.1.100-110

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yogi Widiawati

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/