Twisted fairy tale: Narrative functions and dramatic personae in William Faulkner`s A Rose for Emily

Sufi Ikrima Sa'adah, Nestiani Hutami, Zakiyatul Mufidah

Abstract


William Faulkner`s A Rose for Emily is narrated in a complex narrative structure, thus, making it difficult to follow the story`s chronology despite its relatively short form. This article provides a different approach using Propp`s narratology to show that the story can be read as a modern fairy tale but with some twisted elements. The analysis focuses on the sequence of events based on Propp`s 31 narrative functions. The analysis also highlights the characters performing the functions following Propp`s seven types of dramatis personae. The findings reveal that the events in A Rose for Emily conform to some of the narrative functions of a fairy tale. The initial situation introduces Emily as the heroine of the story, followed by her father's death, which represents the absentation function. In the middle of the narrative, the villainy function serves as the complication of the story. The story`s end is also similar to a fairy tale by the wedding function. However, these fairy tale elements are presented in twisted ways. Emily was introduced only when she died, and she poisoned Homer to be able to live with him ever after. Meanwhile, Emily and Homer also provide twists as the story's heroine and villain.

Keywords


Propp’s narratology; narrative; personae; hero/heroine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman, I. B. (2016). A stylistic analysis of complexity in William Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†Australian International Academic Centre, 7(4), 2203–4714. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.220

Ahmadian, M., & Jorfi, L. (2015). A narratological study and analysis of: The concept of time in William Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.3p.215

Bai, X., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2020). An analysis of Emily’s characters in A rose for Emily from the perspective of narration. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 611–615. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1104.12

Bal, M. (2017). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Barani, F., & Yahya, W. R. W. (2014). Binary opposition, chronology of time and female identity in William Faulkner’s A rose for Emily. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.155

Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/468419

Burg, J., Boyle, A., & Lang, S. D. (2000). Using constraint logic programming to analyze the chronology in “A rose for Emily.†Language Resources and Evaluation, 34(4), 377–392.

Chang, W., & Che, Q. (2016). Character analysis of A rose For Emily. International Conference on Humanities and Social Science (HSS 2016), 2016, 902–907. https://doi.org/10.2991/hss-26.2016.147

Dawson, P., & Mäkelä, M. (2023). Introduction: Narrative today: Telling stories in a post-truth world. In P. Dawson & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), The Routledge companion to narrative theory (pp. 1–7). Routledge.

Fargnoli, A. N., Golay, M., & Hamblin, R. W. (2008). Critical companion to William Faulkner: A literary reference to his life and work. Facts On File, Inc.

Faulkner, W. (2018). A rose for Emily. In K. J. Mays (Ed.), The norton introduction to literature. W.W. Norton and Company.

Herman, D. (2005). Histories of narrative theory (I): A genealogy of early developments. In J. Phelan & P. J. Rabinowitz (Eds.), A companion to narrative theory. Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Herman, D., Phelan, J., Rabinowitz, P. J., Richardson, B., & Warhol, R. (2012). Narrative theory: Core concepts and critical debates. The Ohio State University Press.

Huang, Y. (2019). An analysis on rose in A rose for Emily. Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(2), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v6i2.15099

Jamshaid, S., Kamran, R., Mangrio, R. A., & Mustafa, R.-E.-. (2018). A comparative analysis of Sohni Mahiwal and Cinderella: A Proppian model of narratology. Hayatian Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2(1), 126–144. http://111.68.104.137/index.php/HJLL/article/view/48

Kharmandar, M. A. (2018). The intersections of translational hermeneutics and narrative hermeneutics: The foundational considerations. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies, 6(20), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.15290/CR.2018.20.1.03

Kirchdorfer, U. (2017). Weak men in William Faulkner’s A rose for Emily. Explicator, 75(3), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940.2017.1346564

Melczarek, N. (2009). Narrative motivation in Faulkner’s A rose for emily. Explicator, 67(4), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00144940903250144

Nebeker, H. E. (1970). Emily’s rose of love: Thematic implications of point of view in Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†The Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association, 24(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1346461

Ngulube, Z. (2020). Order, duration, and frequency: A narratological study of Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily.†University of Iceland.

Nieto, C. M. P. (2021). “A rose for Emily’’: The critical heritage†[Universidad de Valladolid]. https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/51403

Pirkova-Jakobson, S. (1968). Introduction to the first edition. In L. A. Wagner (Ed.), Morphology of the folktale (2nd ed., pp. xix–xxii). University of Texas Press.

Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale (L. A. Wagner (ed.); 2nd ed.). University of Texas Press.

Ravari, Z. K. (2017). Genette’s narratology in Faulkner’s "A rose for Emily " and Joyce’s “The dead.†Narrative Across Literary Genres, 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322717789

Rodman, I. (1993). Irony and isolation: Narrative distance in Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†The Faulkner Journal, 8(2), 3–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24907699

Xiaokang, W. (2021). Narratological and stylistic analysis of point of view in Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†English Language, Literature & Culture, 6(3), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ellc.20210603.16

Zhang, P., & Liu, T. (2020). Narrative time in Faulkner’s “A rose for Emily.†2nd International Conference on Humanities, Cultures, Arts and Design (ICHCAD 2020) Narrative, 42–45. https://doi.org/10.25236/ichcad.2020.009




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/e.9.1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Sufi Ikrima Sa'adah, Nestiani Hutami, Zakiyatul Mufidah

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/