Standard English in Bangladesh: A legacy of colonization
Abstract
The paper aims to reveal the debate of Standard English (SE) and Non-standard English from a sociolinguistics perspective in Bangladesh. The validity of so-called Standard English is examined in the light of post-colonial reaction linguistically. The legitimacy of accepting local verities of English as Global Englishes is investigated with due socio-political references. The myth and reality of Standard English in ELT (English Language Teaching) has priority in this paper and it reveals how so-called Standard English is associated with Linguistic Imperialism. The paper examines the sociolinguistic reality of English in Bangladesh from the perspective of 'My English (ME)', which is a linguistic revolt against Standard English (SE). It describes the saturation of English in various domains to understand the place of English in the local linguistic ecology in Bangladesh. Certain linguistic and non-linguistic factors are highlighted here, which may interrupt determining English variety status in Bangladesh. As education is a required field where English has a predominant presence, not only as a language for learning but also as a language in which Bangladeshi learners are anticipated to develop practical proficiency, it is high time to establish rights on own variety of English under the umbrella of Global Englishes. In Bangladesh, thus, the practice of learning Standard English is a colonial legacy. Apart from the mother language, people have been learning English subsequently the British became successful in colonizing this land and its citizens.
References
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1889). The empire writes back. London: Routledge.
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2000). Post-colonial studies the key concepts. London and New York : Routledge .
Bauer, L. (2002). An introduction to international varieties of English . Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.
Bhattacharjee, N. (2008). Developing speaking skill at secondary and higher secondary levels: problems and few recommendations. Stamford Journal of English , vol.4, pp.15-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.3329/sje.v4i0.13487
Christen, S. (2008). Native or non-native speakers. Who are the better English teachers? Retrieved from GRIN Verlag: https://www.grin.com/document/140542
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Great Britain: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Hickey, R. (n.d.). Standard English and standars of English .
Hoque, M. A. (2010, Dec). The influence of the local varieties on the sound patterns of English: A Case Study of Bangladeshi Tertiary Students. IIUC Studies, vol.7, pp. 197-220.
Hossain, M. M., Hasan, M., & Meraj, A. A. (2015). Redefining Bangladeshi variety of English: Print and electronic media perspective. International Journal of Advanced Research, pp.1280-1286.
Kachru, B. B. (2005). Asian Englishes beyond the canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. E. (2008). Cultures, contexts,and world Englishes. New York,: Routledge.
Kubota, R. (2015). Unequal Englishes - the politics of Englishes today. UK: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. London and New York.
Pennycook, A. (1998). English And the discourses of colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Private Limited.
SkutnabbKangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education—or worldwide diversity and human rights? ISBN 0805834672: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Soboleva, S. (2015, Feb). Global language: New opportunities or inferiority complex∗. US-China Foreign Language, vol.13(no.2), pp.85-91. doi:doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2015.02.001
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly , pp.377-388.
Article Statistic
Abstract view : 294 timesPDF views : 579 times
How To Cite This :
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.