Legal Consequences of Binding the Sale and Purchase of Land Rights Under Hands That Have Been Warned by a Notary

Siget Prahmono

Abstract


The researcher conducted this research with the intention of knowing and analyzing the legal status of PPJB for private land rights that have been Waarmerking and also to find out and analyze whether a PPJB for private land rights that has been Waarmerking must make a Deed of Sale and Purchase. In this study, a sociological legal approach will be used and primary data will be used as the main data, namely the results of interviews conducted with Mrs. Arini Sutanti, S.H., M.Kn. She is one of the Notaries in Temanggung Regency and is also supported by secondary data from a number of sources which are then analyzed and processed using qualitative methods in order to obtain a conclusion. The results of the study show that the sale and purchase agreement for land rights carried out privately which was then carried out by Waarmerking efforts by the Notary does not affect the authenticity of the contents or signatures contained in the deed, the role of Waarmerking is only limited to entering it in the Notary's book as an archive if at some point the agreement letter is lost or damaged, so that all parties who bind themselves do not have to re-make the agreement letter. This means that the evidentiary power and status of the Waarmerking itself can be interpreted as if the Notary has no responsibility for the contents and signatures contained therein, so the related parties will only have responsibility for the contents and signatures contained in the letter.

References


A. Pitlo, “Pembuktian dan Daluwarsa Menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata, (ahli bahasa oleh M. Isa Arief)”, Intermasa, Jakarta, 1986, p. 34

Dewi Kurnia Putri, Amin Purnawan, “Perbedaan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Lunas Dengan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tidak Lunas”, Jurnal Akta Vol. 4 No. 4, 2017, p. 632

Fransiska Mayasari, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Akta Notaris Di Tegal”, Jurnal Akta, Vol 4 No. 4, Desember 2017, hlm 516,

Ghita Aprillia Tulenan, “Kedudukan dan Fungsi Akta di Bawah Tangan yang di Legalisasi Notaris, Lex Administratum”, Vol. II – No. 2, April – Juni 2014, p. 122.

Hartono Supratikno, 1982, “Aneka Perjanjian Jual Beli”, Yogyakarta, Seksi Notariat Fakultas Hukum UGM, P. 1.

https://blog.justika.com/dokumen-bisnis/contoh-legalisasi-notaris/ diakses pada tanggal 20 Juni 2024 pukul 19.00

Irwansyah, 2021, “Penelitian Hukum; Pilihan Metode dan Penulisan Artikel”, Mirra Buana Medika, Yogyakarta, p. 176

Jazim Hamidi, “Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Konstitusi Press & Citra Media”, Yogyakarta, 2006, p. 200.

KUHPerdata dan KUHAPerdata, TK: Pustaka Buana, 2015, p. 295.

Marwan Mas, “Pengantar Ilmu Hukum”, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2003, p.39

R. Subekti, “Hukum Perjanjian,” (Jakarta: Intermasa, 2004), p. 75.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006, p.40

Soedharyo Soimin, “Status Hak dan Pembebasan Tanah”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2001, p. 87


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.