The Considerations Analysis of Different PTUN and MA Decisions which are Detrimental to Insurance Consumers

Rio Hadi Kusumah, Imam Haryanto

Abstract


This study discusses the differences between the Supreme Court (MA) Decision Number 647 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 and the Jakarta PTUN Decision Number 475/G/2023/PTUN.JKT related to the case of PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna (Kresna Life) and its impact on the protection of insurance consumer rights. This study uses a normative legal method with a statute approach and a case study approach. Data were collected through a literature study covering laws and regulations, court decisions, and expert opinions related to the insurance industry. In general, the MA Decision annulled the determination of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) filed by individual creditors, stating that the settlement of obligations must be supervised by the Financial Services Authority (OJK) through a liquidation mechanism. Conversely, the Jakarta PTUN annulled the decision to revoke Kresna Life's business license by the OJK, thus prolonging legal uncertainty for policyholders. As a result of these conflicting decisions, the liquidation process that should guarantee the return of claim funds to policyholders is hampered, and consumer rights are difficult to realize. The results of the study show that the differences in these decisions weaken the authority of the OJK as a regulator, as stipulated in Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (UU P2SK) and POJK Number 28/POJK.05/2015 concerning the liquidation of insurance companies. This reduces public trust in the insurance industry and increases the risk of financial loss for policyholders.


Keywords


Consumer; Court; Protection; Supreme.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Baihaqqy, Mochammad Rizaldy Insan. "Dampak UU P2SK terhadap Tugas dan Fungsi Pengawasan OJK." Co-Value: Jurnal Ekonomi, Koperasi & Kewirausahaan, vol. 14, no. 6, 2023.

Evania Larisa, Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak, Yusrambono. 2023. Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna Atas Gagal Bayar Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Al Qodiri: Jurnal pendidikan, Sosial, dan Keagamaan. Vol. 21 No. 1. p. 11-23.

Fauzy, Muhamad Jiia, et al. "Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dihubungkan dengan UU P2SK." Review UNES, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023.

Indra, Nancy Margaretha. “Perkembangan Peraturan Asuransi di Indonesia.” INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 3, no. 3, 2023, p. 10707-10718.

Nurainiyah, Nilam, I Ketut Astawa, dan Tri Setiady. "Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Polis dalam Konteks Pengalihan Liabilitas dan Restrukturisasi Asuransi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perasuransian." Review UNES, vol. 7, no. 1, 2024, p. 169–171.

Santri, Selvi Harvia, dan Rahdiansyah. "Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Polis Asuransi Jiwa terhadap Penetapan Klausula Baku." UIR Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2016, p. 23–24.

Takalamingan, Fallahudin Tsauki. "Peran OJK dalam Mencegah Perusahaan Investasi Ilegal." Lex Et Societatis, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021.

Utiyafina Mardhati Hazhin, Marchety Riwani Diaz, 2022. Efektivitas Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Polis Asuransi Jiwa Kresna Pasca Putusan Kasasi. Negara Hukum. Vol. 13, No. 2. p. 210-226.

Wafa Nihayati Inayah, Marsitiningsih. 2021. Perlindungan Hukum atas Kerugian Nasabah Asuransi Terhadap Kasus Gagal Bayar Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Kosmik Hukum. Vol. 21 No. 02. p: 133-141

Internet:

Hukumonline.com. “Respons OJK Soal Putusan Sela PKPU Asuransi Kresna Life”. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/respons-ojk-soal-putusan-sela-pkpu-asuransi-kresna-life-lt5fe2f9889199b. Accessed on 14 Dec 2024.

Nurdiana, Avanty. “Awam mula kisah kasus kresna life”. https://insight.kontan.co.id/news/awal-mula-kisah-kasus-kresna-life. Accessed on 14 Dec 2024.

OJK. “Siaran Pers: Kresna Life Belum Penuhi Komitmen Penyehatan Keuangan”. https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Pages/Kresna-Life-Belum-Penuhi-Komitmen-Penyehatan-Keuangan.aspx. Accessed on 14 Dec 2024

Pratama, Galih. “Keputusan “Sesat”! Kresna Life Menang Lagi di PTUN, Ini Preseden “Seburuk-Buruknya” Keputusan”. https://infobanknews.com/keputusan-sesat-kresna-life-menang-lagi-di-ptun-ini-preseden-seburuk-buruknya-keputusan/. Accessed on 15 Dec 2024.

Tim Redaksi CNBC. “Kronologi Kasus Kresna Life hingga Dicabut Izin OJK”. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20230623174406-17-448791/kronologi-kasus-kresna-life-hingga-dicabut-izin-ojk. Accessed on 15 Dec 2024.

Tobing, Sorta. “Perjalanan Kasus Kresna Life, Dari Gagal Bayar Hingga Berujung Pailit”. https://katadata.co.id/finansial/keuangan/60cc72dd9f62c/perjalanan-kasus-kresna-life-dari-gagal-bayar-hingga-berujung-pailit?. Accessed on 14 Dec 2024.

Regulation:

Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 28/POJK.05/2015 concerning Dissolution, Liquidation, and Bankruptcy of Insurance Companies. Republic of Indonesia, 2015

Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. 1999.

Law No. 40 of 2014 concerning Insurance. Republic of Indonesia, 2014.

Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector. Republic of Indonesia, 2023.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.6.4.588-599

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: