The Authentic Deed that is Degraded due to False Information

Moses Nathanael, Gunawan Djajaputra

Abstract


An authentic deed is known as the strongest and most legally binding evidence in legal proceedings. However, its integrity can be compromised when fraudulent data is incorporated, leading to the degradation of its evidentiary value. This research aims to analyze the legal implications of authentic deeds that have been degraded due to data falsification and to explore the notary’s responsibility in such cases. This research used normative juridical approach, this study examined statutory regulations, court decisions, and legal doctrines related to document authenticity. The findings indicate that an authentic deed containing falsified data may lose its status as a perfect piece of evidence and be downgraded to an underhand deed, depending on the extent of the forgery. Additionally, notaries may be held accountable if negligence is proven in verifying the validity of the data. This research contributes to a better understanding of the legal protection mechanisms for parties involved in notarial transactions and highlights the importance of strict verification procedures to uphold the authenticity of legal documents.



Keywords


Authentic; Degradation; Falsification; Responsibility.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Journals:

Iin Purwaningsih (2020). Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Melibatkan Notaris. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, Vol.3, (No.2).

Ngutra, T. (2016). Hukum dan Sumber-Sumber Hukum. Jurnal Supremasi, Vol. 11, (No. 2).

Risa Hermawati. (2020). Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1003 K/PID/2015). Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol 2, (No. 2).

Books:

H. Nur Solikin. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Perseroan Komanditer CV. Penerbit Qiara Media Press and Publisher, Pasuruan.

Habib Adjie (2016). Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram University Pres.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki (2005). Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Internet:

Sleman District Court No. 63/Pid.B/ 2020/PN Sm

Supreme Court Ruling No. 379 K/Pid/2021.

Regulation:

Civil Code

Criminal Code

Law No. 2 of 2014 on Amendment of Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary

Law No. 30 of 2004 on Notary




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.7.1.71-81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Law Development Journal has been indexed in: