Effectiveness of Implementing Restorative Justice at The Semarang State Attorney
Abstract
The basic principle of restorative justice is the provision of restoration to victims who suffer as a result of crime by providing compensation to the victim, peace, the perpetrator carrying out social work or other agreements. This writing aims to find out and analyze the implementation of restorative justice at the Semarang District Prosecutor's Office, obstacles to implementing restorative justice at the Semarang District Prosecutor's Office, and the effectiveness of implementing restorative justice at the Semarang District Prosecutor's Office. Research methods are a very important thing in research, both in sociological or empirical and normative research. Data analysis is carried out qualitatively, meaning that it describes the data in a quality manner in the form of sentences that are orderly, coherent, logical, non-overlapping and effective, making it easier to interpret the data and understand the results of the analysis. The analytical knife in this writing uses the theory of legal certainty, progressive legal theory, and the theory of legal effectiveness. The results of the research show that the implementation of terminating prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice is seen in Article 140 Paragraph (2) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code, the public prosecutor can stop prosecution, for the reasons: terminating prosecution for technical reasons and terminating prosecution for policy reasons. Obstacles in implementing the termination of prosecution for criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice are in the form of internal obstacles and external obstacles. The effectiveness of terminating prosecution in criminal acts of theft based on restorative justice is quite good, however, the effectiveness of resolving restorative justice in repeating criminal acts by perpetrators depends on each individual perpetrator. In several criminal cases, this restorative resolution makes the perpetrator realize his mistake and many regret it.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Journals:
Grees Ayu Alamdari, 2023, "The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice in Resolving Crimes in the Lengkong Police Sector, Bandung", Journal of ADVANCES in Social Humanities Research, Vol. 1 No. 5.
Husein Pohan, "Resolving Crimes Using a Restorative Justice Approach Taken by the Prosecutor's Office", Vol. II (1), Journal of Legal Science Concepts, (Medan: Locus Media, 2022).
Prima Anggara, "Application of Restorative Justice in the Crime of Petty Theft", Vol. III (3), Student Scientific Journal, 2019.
Reynaldi Sinyo Wakkary, "Implementation of Restorative Justice Principles in the Prosecution System Based on Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020", Vol X (9), Lex Crimen Journal, 2021.
Sefriani, "The Urgency of Reconceptualization and Legislation of Restorative Justice in Indonesia", Vol. II (2), Rechts Vinding Journal, 2013.
Books:
Adami Chazawi, “Criminal Law Lesson 3: Trial and Participation” (Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002).
Hendi Suhendi, "Application of the Principle of Opportunity in Law Enforcement (A Juridical and Sociological Review)", in Anthology of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, Editor Andi Hamzah, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984).
Hilman Hadi Kusuma, 2012, Methods for Making Working Papers or Theses Legal Science, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Regulation:
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Criminal Code
Criminal Procedure Code
Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Law no. 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia
Law No. 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Resorative Justice
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.2.4.%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: