Legal Analysis of Disparity in Judges' Decisions Regarding the Implementation of the Element of State Financial Loss in Corruption Crimes

Galang Nugrahaning Tunggal

Abstract


This research aims to analyze and describe the disparity in judges' decisions regarding the application of the element of state financial loss in criminal acts of corruption; To analyze and describe the weaknesses in the disparity in judges' decisions regarding the application of the element of state financial loss in criminal acts of corruption and what the solution is. This writing uses legal system theory and progressive legal theory, a sociological juridical approach method, research specifications are descriptive analysis, data sources consist of primary data and secondary data taken from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials, data collection techniques through observation and interview. The results of this research are the first to apply the element of loss in the Supreme Court's efforts to avoid disparities in criminal punishment for criminal acts of corruption stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines Article 2 and Article 3 of the PTPK Law which are not accompanied by adjustments to statutory regulations such as the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code. to support this system, thereby giving rise to disparities. The two weaknesses in the legal structure are odd legal considerations and odd judgement considerations. The weakness of the legal substance is that state losses are only regulated in articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Law and differences in the meaning of state finances in various statutory regulations. Weaknesses of Legal Culture, namely family culture, paternalistic societal orientation, and a societal culture that lacks the courage to be frank. The solution to the weaknesses in implementing elements detrimental to state finances is that first, the Government and DPR are expected to make improvements to Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes means that there needs to be a paradigm shift in understanding between law enforcement and coordination agencies, so that there is the same perception in understanding the elements of criminal acts of corruption.

Keywords


Corruption; Decisions; Disparity; Judge.

References


Bambang Tri Bawono, Faktor-Faktor Yang Menjadi Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Berat/Ringannya Pidana Terhadap Terdakwa, Jurnal Hukum, 2004

Eddy Mulyadi Soepardi, Memahami Kerugian Keuangan Negara sebagai Salah Satu Unsur Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Makalah Disampaikan dalam Ceramah Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pakuan Bogor. 24 Januari 2009

Fatah, A., Jaya, N. S. P., & Juliani, H. Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diponegoro Law Journal, 2016,

Jawade Hafidz, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Perkara Korupsi Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyelamatan Uang Negara, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2011

Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Penindakan Perkara Krupsi ICW 2023

Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Penindakan Perkara Krupsi ICW 2022

Leo Nugroho, Mengaji Ulang keberadaan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Disampaikan dalam Focus Group Discussion “Mengaji Ulang keberadaan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara dalam Delik Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, 17 September 2013.

Miftakhul Khobid, Gunarto, Analisa Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 2018

Resdian Wisudya Kharismawan, Sri Endah Wahyuningsih, Kebijakan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Secara Bersama-Sama Dan Berlanjut, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 2017

Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif. Hukum Yang Membebaskan, Jurnal Hukum Progresif, Vol. 1, No. 1/April 2005, Program Doktor Undip Semarang

Vito Tanzi, Corruption, Governmental Activities, and Markets, IMF Working Paper, Agustus 1994

Yudi Kristiana, Rekontruksi Birokrasi Kejaksaan Dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Studi Penyidikan, Penyelidikan, dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tesis PDIH UNDIP Semarang, 2006

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi, teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana, Almni, Bandung, 2005

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Revisi, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2010




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.991-1000

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: