Disparity in Judges' Decisions in the Application of Legal Sanctions for Election Crimes

Citra Suherman

Abstract


The aim of this research is to find out and analyze the judge's considerations in imposing sentences on perpetrators of criminal acts, the legal consequences of disparities in judges' decisions on election crimes and to analyze the influence of disparities in judge decisions on public trust in the justice system in cases of election crimes. Research Method This research uses normative research in an effort to uncover the truth in statutory regulations. Disparities in judges' decisions on election crimes have several significant legal consequences. First, legal uncertainty is created because perpetrators of election crimes may not know the type of crime that will be imposed by the judge. Second, injustice arises because defendants with similar cases can receive different sentences, even though the facts are similar. Third, diversity in the application of the law is reflected in disparities in judges' decisions, because judges can have different approaches in determining fair and proportional sentences. In addition, disparities in judges' decisions can also have a negative impact on public trust in the justice system in cases of election crimes, creating doubts about the integrity of judges and the objectivity of decisions. This can disrupt public participation in elections and has the potential to disrupt democratic stability and social order.


Keywords


Crime; Election; Judge.

References


Amrun, "Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Timbulnya Disparitas Pemidanaan", Menara Ilmu 12.2 (2018), h. 2

Ardiansyah, Irfan. Disparitas Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Penyebab Dan Penanggulangannya). Hawa dan AHWA, 2017.. hlm 54

Jimly Asshidiqie, Menegakkan Etika Penyelenggaraan Pemilu, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013), h. 45

Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktik Peradilan, (Jakarta: Mandar Maju, 2017), h. 127

Moeljatno, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Cet. 9, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015), h. 17

Jurnal Jurnal

Ariyanti, Vivi. "Kebebasan Hakim Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Menangani Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia." Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2019): 162-174.

Bohalima, Stevani Putriani. "Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Bebas Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Keadaan Memberatkan." Jurnal Panah Hukum 2, no. 2 (2023): 49-56.

Langkun, Tama S., Mouna Wasef, and Tri Wahyu. "Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi." (2014)

Manurung, Frengky, Alvi Syahrin, Madiasa Ablisar, and Sunarmi Sunarmi. "Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 159/PID. SUS/2019/PN. RAP dan Putusan NO. 626/PID. SUS/2020/PN. RAP)." Law Jurnal 2, no. 1 (2021): 62-80.

Muhammad Shahuddin Al Ayyubi dan Dian Esti Pratiwi, “Disparitas Putusan Hakim dal

am Menerapkan Noodweer Exces dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Mengakibatkan Kematian”, Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol. 9, No. 1, (2023), h. 971

Nazla, Elyna Noor Dina. "Analisis Disparitas Putusan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Secara Bersama-Sama (Studi Komparatif Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi)." Phd Diss., Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 2023.

Novika, Giofanni Dian. "Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Perkara Pencurian Pasal 363 Kuhp Oleh Anak (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Negeri Pontianak)." Jurnal Hukum Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Untan (Jurnal Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Hukum) Universitas Tanjungpura 4, no. 4.

Nugroho, Bastianto. "Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP." Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2017): 17-36.

Seba, Maria Jollyvia. "Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Atas Penganiayaan Berencana Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Dalam KUHP." Lex administratum 5.9 (2017), h. 109

Sri Kusriyah. “Spatial Synchronization and Territorial Planning Policies between Regions and National Spatial Planning”. Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2021). p. 110, url : http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/view/15714

Yuda, Ivan Kusuma. "Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika." PhD diss., Universitas Airlangga, 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: