Protection of Human Rights in the Implementation of the Death Penalty in Indonesia: Legal Analysis and Recommendations for Reform

Cut Lia Marlina

Abstract


The death penalty has become a controversial topic in the criminal law system in Indonesia and presents serious challenges related to the protection of human rights. This study presents a comprehensive legal analysis of the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia with a special emphasis on human rights aspects. Through in-depth research on related laws and policies as well as concrete case studies, the author identifies a number of critical issues involving human rights in the process of implementing the death penalty. This study also proposes various recommendations for reform aimed at improving and strengthening the Indonesian criminal law system in the context of the death penalty. These recommendations include changes to legislation, improvements in legal procedures, and increased awareness of human rights at the government and community levels. In line with Indonesia's commitment to universal human rights principles, these recommendations are expected to pave the way for positive change in the application of the death penalty and ensure more effective protection of human rights in the Indonesian criminal law system. The research method used is a descriptive analytical legal research type, which means that it obtains a direct, clear and systematic picture related to the facts of the problem being studied in full. The approach method in this study uses a normative legal approach method. The results of the study indicate that the application of the death penalty in Indonesia is a gross human rights violation that deprives a person of the right to life. Therefore, in deciding the death penalty, many considerations must be made by the judge. In the context of human rights, it can be seen that the application of the death penalty is not in sync with one of the true objectives of punishment, which is to improve the perpetrators of crimes, but the application of the death penalty does not provide an opportunity for the perpetrators to improve themselves. Alternative punishments that need to be sought and applied in sentencing perpetrators who do not violate human rights are through reform and legal renewal.


Keywords


Death Penalty; Human Rights; Reform

References


Anggita Raja Wisnu, “Pengaturan Sanksi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmiah (2021). url: https://fh.unram.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ANGGITA-RAJA-WISNU-D1A017031.pdf.

Amelia Arief, “Problematika Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, Vol. 19 No. 1, 2019.

Baren Sipayung, “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”, Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2023).

Bima Guntara, “Penerapan Pidana Mati di Indonesia Dalam Literatur Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021), 241. url: http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/rjih/article/view/16155/8546.

Christianto, H. “Pembaharuan Makna Asas Legalitas”. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 39, No.3 (2017), p. 12.

Elmar I. Lubis, Perkembangan Isu Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia, Jurnal Opinio Juris, Vol. 04, Januari-April (2012), p.42.

Friska Rosita Roring, “Penerapan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Sudut Pandang Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia”, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. XI No 4 (2023).

Gabrielle Aldy Manoppo, dkk, “Analisis Pidana Mati Berdasarkan Pasal 100 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sam Ratulangi Lex Administratum, Vol. XIII/No. 1 (2023), url: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/51527/44196.

Gisella Tiara Cahyani, dkk, “Analisis Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Alternatif Penegakan Hukum”, Jurnal Al-Qisth Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 1 (2023).

Krisnanda Etika Putri, dkk, “Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Eksekusi Pidana Mati”, Dipenogoro Law Journal, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2016.

Maulidah, Khilmatin & Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Kebijakan Formulasi Asas Permaafan Hakim Dalam Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional”. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2019), pp. 281-293.

Nata Sukam Bangun, “Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmiah, 2014, url: http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/5236/1/JURNAL%20ILMIAH.pdf.

Parhan Muntafa & Ade Mahmud, “Penerapan Hukum Pidana Mati Bersyarat Dalam KUHP Baru Di Hubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum”, Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2023).

Roby Anugrah, “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia”, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2021), p. 80-95. url: https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jphi/article/view/10236

Teguh Samuel Praise Purba, “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia Dan Ditinjau Dari Sudut Pandang HAM, Jurnal Rectum, Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): 395-404.

Zakiy Bima Kusuma Aliyan, “Pembaharuan Hukum Keberadaan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Korupsi”, Jurnal Publicuho, Vol. 6, No. 2 (May-July 2023) pp. 534-548.

A, Z Abidin dan A. Hamzah. (2002). Bentuk-Bentuk Khusus Perwujudan Delik (Percobaan, Penyertaan, dan Gabungan Delik) dan Hukum Panitensier, Jakarta: Ilmu Jaya.

El Muhtaj Madja. (2008). Dimensi-Dimensi HAM Mengurai Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. (2015). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra

Ubaedillah. 2009. Demokrasi Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Masyarakat Madani, Jakarta: ICCE UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/681576/mengenal-hukuman-mati-di-indonesia#:~:text=Kendati%20demikian%2C%20ketentuan%20Pasal%2011,dilakukan%20dengan%20ditembak%20sampai%20mati.n.

https://law.unja.ac.id/hak-atas-hidup-siapa-yang-bisa-mencabut/.

https://fahum.umsu.ac.id/amnesti/.

www.hukumonline.com.

https://www.detik.com/jateng/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-06568016/apa-itu-hukuman-mati-Pasal 99 UU No. 1 Tahun 2023.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/rlj.3.4.261-270

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ratio Legis Journal has been indexed in: