Notary's Responsibility Regarding Deeds Which Do Not Fulfil Material Elements and Truth

Dina Rahmawati, Aryani Witasari

Abstract


Abstract. Notary is a very important profession to help provide legal certainty to the community in the form of providing legal products in the form of authentic deeds. The authentic deed cannot be separated from the information received by the notary at the time of making the deed, but if the information in the deed is not in accordance with the truth and can harm the parties, of course the notary must be responsible for his actions, for that in this study has the aim to study and analyze the responsibility and legal consequences of the making of Notarial deeds that do not fulfill material truth, especially in Pati Regency. The type of research used in this study is a qualitative approach method, which is a study to explore and understand the meaning that a number of individuals or groups of people consider to come from social or humanitarian problems. The research used to investigate, find, describe, and explain the quality or specialty of social influences that cannot be explained, measured or described through a quantitative approach, while the approach method used by the author is empirical legal or sociological legal research, namely a legal research method that seeks to see the law in a real sense or can be said to see, examine how the law works in society withdata collection process through observation and interviews. Based on the research results, it was concluded that the responsibility carried out based on one of the notary cases in Pati Regency is criminal responsibility for the material truth in the deed he made, as well as being responsible for the Notary's job regulations (UUJN) for the material truth in the deed he made, Secondly, the legal consequences in the case that ensnared the notary are legal consequences in the form of sanctions, which are not desired by the legal subject (unlawful acts) by being proven by a court decision in the form of imprisonment and changes to the deed he made are considered null and void by law.

Keywords: Consequences; Legal; Notary; Responsibility.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andi Hamminanga,2019, “Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan UUJN” Tesis Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Anke Dwi Saputro, 2008, Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang dan Di Masa Datang: 100 Tahun Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. PT. Gramedia Pustaka , Jakarta.

Arif Furchan, 1992, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.

Dedy Pramono, 2015, Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia, Lex Jurnalica, Volume 12 Nomor 3 December 2015.

Fabryan Nur Muhammad,2019, Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris, Media of Law and Sharia, Vol.1, No 1. p. 7

Ghamsan Anad,2018, Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris.Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.

Habib Adjie, 2017, Kebatalan Dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Haryanto, 2018, Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia dalam Toeri dan Praktik, Prenada Media, Depok.

https://www.puskompati.org/profil-kabupaten-pati-bumi-mina-tani

Inka Candra Kharizma, 2021, Administrasi Dan Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Atas Akta Notariil Yang Batal Demi Hukum, Officium Notarium. no. 3 vol. 1 december.

Interview with (Bambang Sri Laksono Pamukas,) Notary in Pati Regency, 07 February 2025.Abdul Ghofur Anshori,2009, Lembaga Kenotarian Indonesia Fresfektif Hukum Dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Interview with (Bambang Wahyu Permono) Member of the Honorary Council of Notaries, 06 February 2025.

Interview with (Bambang Wahyu Permono, Member of the Honorary Council of Notaries, 06 February 2025.Wulan Agustini, Benny Djaja. 2023. Akibat Hukum Dan Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Cacat Hukum, Lex Jurnalica. Volume 20 Nomor 1, April 2023.

James Yosep Palenewen, 2024, Tanggung Jawab dan Peran Notaris, Widina Medina Utama, Bandung.

Komang Ayuk Septianingsih, Dkk., 2020, Kekuatan Alat Bukti Akta Otentik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata, Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Volume 2 No 3 2020.

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions.

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Notary Positions

Mukti Fajar ND dan Yualianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Praja Pranoto, Isnaini, Sri Pinem, 2023, Kedudukan Sanksi Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Atas Terjadinya Pemalsuan Akta Otentik, Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)) Vol 5, No. 4, Mei 2023.

Salim H.S. dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 2016, Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis (Buku Ketiga), RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Sjaifrurrahman, H.A, 2011. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta, Mandar Maju Bandung.

Suwignyo, H. 2019. Keabsahan Cap Jempol sebagai Pengganti Tanda Tangan dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Notarius,Vol 1No 1.

Syahrul Borman, 2019, Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Dalam Perspektif Undang- Undang Jabatan Notaris, Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, Volume 3 No 1 2019.

Tasskja Nofeyska Pradistya. 2022. Tanggung Jawab Notaris Secara Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Administrasi Yang Lalai Karena Membuat Akta Perjanjian Yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Selong Nomor 87/PDT.G/2019/PNSEL). Indonesian Notary. Vol 4 No 1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office: TABELLIUS: Journal of Law Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455

Phone: 024-6583584 (574)
Email : tabelius@unissula.ac.id