Differences in Determining Ramadan and Shawwal: A Discourse Analysis of the Book Nusus al-Akhyar fi al-Shaum Wa al-Ifthar

Ika Wahyu Ningsih*    -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Anwar Sarang, Rembang, Indonesia
Fitri Febriyanti  -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Anwar Sarang, Rembang, Indonesia
Iqbal Ainur Rizki    -  Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, New Zealand

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/jua.v6i2.24166

Supp. File(s): Research Instrument

The phenomenon of differences in the implementation determination of Eid al-Fitr in 1418 H was regretted by the Indonesian people. Responding to the emergence of differences in the determination of 1418 H, KH Maimoen Zubair through his work Nusuus al-Akhyar fi Al-Shum wa Al-Iftihar intends to provide solutions to Muslims in Indonesia in facing the differences surrounding the determination of Eid al-Fitr. This type of research is qualitative research with the research approach used being discourse analysis initiated by Van Dijk. The data used in this study consisted of primary data and secondary data. Primary data are in the form of lexemes, words, phrases, and sentences in Arabic that contain ideas about the determination of the beginning of the month of Ramadan and Shawwal in the book. Secondary data come from sources, journals, print media, online journalism, and other scientific works to find out the context of social situations that can influence the writing of the book. Data collection methods in this study are interviews and literature study. The results showed that the linguistic aspect that stands out in the discourse of persuasion is the invitation to promote unity in the midst of controversy over differences in each group; the author's ideology appears in the title, the lexemes "judge" and "hilal"; the pronouns of the time and person in the text indicate that there is a different social context from the current condition. The social conditions that appear in the book are the differences in the method of determination by Indonesian Mass Organizations and the emergence of certain polemics in 1998.

Supplement Files

Keywords: Maimoen Zubair, Discourse Analysis, Nuṣūṣ al-Akhyār fī Al-Ṣhoum wa Al-Ifrhār’s Book

  1. Aliah, Yoce. Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Multiperspektif. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2014.
  2. Azhari, Susiknan. Penggunaan Sistem Hisab & Rukyat Di Indonesia: Studi Tentang Interaksi Muhammadiyah Dan NU. Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI, 2007.
  3. Bukhori, Abu ’Abdillah al. Sohih Al-Bukhori. Dar al-Thuq al-Najah, n.d.
  4. Daud, Abu. Sunan Abi Daud. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-’Asriyyah, n.d.
  5. Dijk, Teun A. Van. Text and Context: Exploration in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman, 1977.
  6. Eriyanto. Analisis Wacana Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Printing Cemerlang, 2011.
  7. Hadikusuma, Djarnawi. “Mengapa Muhammadiyah Memakai Hisab?” Suara Muhammadiyah, 1973.
  8. Harun, Hajrah, Anisa Maulidiah Alam, and Jufri Jufri. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Pada Pidato Presiden Tahun 2022: Model Norman Fairclough.” Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra 10, no. 1 (2024): 169–81. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i1.3163.
  9. Hidayat, M. Nur. “Hukum, Lajnah Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama 1926-1999 (Telaah Kritis Terhadap Keputusan Fiqih.” Hukum Dan Syari’ah 3, no. 1 (2012).
  10. Ilyas, Hamim. Pengembangan Pemikiran Keislaman Muhammadiyah: Purifikasi & Dinamisasi. Yogyakarta: Majelis Tarjih PPI & LPPI, 2000.
  11. Izzuddin, Ahmad. “Dinamika Hisab Rukyat Di Indonesia.” Istinbath 12, no. 2 (2008): 248–73.
  12. ———. “Pemikiran Hisab Rukyah Klasik (Studi Atas Pemikiran Muhammad Mas Manshur Al-Batawi).” Jurnal Hukum Islam 13, no. 37 (2015): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v13i1.494.
  13. Izzudin, Ahmad. Fiqh Hisab Rukyah Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LOGUNG, 2003.
  14. ———. “Syaikh Zubair Umar Al-Jailany ( w . 1411 H / 1990 M ) Dalam Sejarah Hisab Di Indonesia.” Al-Marshad 2, no. 2 (2016): 94–105.
  15. Kamlludin, Iqbal. “ELFALAKY : Pandangan Mui Terkait Perbedaan Penetapan 1 Syawal 1444 H DI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Ilmu Falak 3, no. 2 (2019): 96.
  16. Kanthongumur. Oase Jiwa Rangkuman Pengajian KH Maimoen Zubair Di Pesantren Al-Anwar. Yogyakarta: Jagad Press, 2016.
  17. Kridalaksana, Harimurti. Kelas Kata Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1986.
  18. Mahsun. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode Dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
  19. Maskufa, and Wahyu Widiana. “Titik Kritis Penentuan Awal Puasa Dan Hari Raya Di Indonesia.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 12, no. 1 (2012): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v12i1.981.
  20. MGS, Tim Karya Ilmiah. Mengenal Lebih Dekat Masyayikh Sarang. Yogyakarta: CV. Global Press, 2018.
  21. Muslifah, Siti. “Upaya Menyikapi Perbedaan Penentuan Awal Bulan Qamariyah Di Indonesia” 1 (2020).
  22. Mustaqim, Riza Afrian. Hisab & Rukyat. Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press, n.d.
  23. Oktiaputri, Amellia. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Van Dijk Terhadap Berita Online (Gaduh Pedulilindungi Dituding Melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia, Ada Apa?).” Semantik 12, no. 1 (2023): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v12i1.p1-20.
  24. Pardede, Parlindungan, Yumna Rasyid, and Miftahulkhairah Anwar. “Manipulasi Linguistik Sebagai Instrumen Politik Dalam Animal Farm: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis.” Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya 6, no. 2 (2023): 449–66. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i2.605.
  25. Rachmawati, Fatma Dwi Rachmawati. Mindaudah. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Prosesi Jokowi Mantu Kaesang Pada Berita Online Detik.Com.” Journal of Education Research 4, no. 4 (2023): 2364–76.
  26. Suhanah. “Dampak Sosial Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Penentuan Awal Ramadhan Dan 1 Syawal Terhadap Umat Islam Di Kota Semarang.” Multikultural Dan Multireligius 11, no. 2 (2012): 160. https://jurnalharmoni.kemenag.go.id/index.php/harmoni/article/view/250.
  27. T. Djamaluddin. “Aspek Astronomis Dalam Kesatuan Ummat.” UIN Walisongo Seemarang, 2016. https://media.isnet.org/kmi/isnet/Djamal/rmd-id1420.html.
  28. ———. “Renungan Tahun Baru 1419 H: Pelajaran Tiga Hari Raya.” Pikiran Rakyat, 1998. https://tdjamaluddin.wordpress.com/2010/06/15/renungan-tahun-baru-1419-h-pelajaran-tiga-hari-raya/.
  29. Wulandari, Sri, Raden Yusuf Sidiq Budiawan, and Rawinda Fitrotul Mualafina. “Analisis Wacana Pada Pesan Penipuan Atas Nama Baim Wong Di Media Sosial (Model Van Dijk).” Sintesis 17, no. 1 (2023): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24071/sin.v17i1.5395.
  30. Zahro. Ahmad. Lajnah Bahtsul Masail Nahdlatul Ulama 1926-1999 (Telaah Kritis Terhadap Keputusan Hukum Fiqih). Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2001.
  31. Zubair, Maimoen. Muqifuna Hawla Al-Shoum Wa Al-Ifthar. Rembang: : Lajnah Ta‟lif Wa al-Nasr Pondok Pesantren al-Anwar, n.d.
  32. ———. Nusūs Al-Akhyar Fi Al-Shoum Wa Al-Ifthar. Rembang: Lajnah Ta’lif wa al-Nasr Pondok Pesantren al-Anwar, n.d.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Ika Wahyu Ningsih, Fitri Febriyanti, Iqbal Ainur Rizki
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

ULUL ALBAB: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Department of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
Jl. Kaligawe Ray KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Phone: +62 81359100363
Website: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua
Email: jurnalululalbab@unissula.ac.id

ULUL ALBAB stats

ISSN: 2597-6168 (Print)
ISSN: 2597-6176 (Online)
DOI : 10.30659/jua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps