Simplified Lawsuits in Dispute Resolution Within Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia

Dadin Solihin*    -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Pelita Nusa Bandung Barat, Indonesia
Setiadi Setiadi    -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Pelita Nusa Bandung Barat, Indonesia
Bubun Bunyamin    -  Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Pelita Nusa Bandung Barat, Indonesia
Deni Kamaludin Yusup    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
Ahmad Hasan Ridwan    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.30659/jua.v6i1.37265

Supp. File(s): Transcripts
This research is based on the numerous disputes in Sharia economic law within Sharia Business Financial Institutions, legal aid in the field of Sharia economic law, and civil matters that have not been well resolved. The Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA RI) No. 4 of 2019 regulates the resolution of Sharia economic law disputes in a simplified manner. However, the socialization of this regulation to the public is still lacking, causing frequent obstacles in the implementation of this PERMA RI. This research is a literature study with a juridical approach aimed at analyzing the implementation of PERMA RI in the resolution of Sharia economic cases. The primary data in this research includes PERMA RI No. 4 of 2019, PERMA RI No. 14 of 2016, PERMA RI No. 2 of 2015, and PERMA RI No. 1 of 2016. Several relevant cases are used as important data to analyze the implementation of these regulations. The results of this research show that the process of simplified lawsuits in the resolution of Sharia economic disputes, which is expected to be easier, faster, and cheaper in court, has not been realized in accordance with PERMA RI. This needs to be a concern for the Supreme Court because most Sharia economic dispute cases involve companies and the public. If the Supreme Court regulations are not properly implemented in court proceedings, it will create a space for injustice. Therefore, the socialization of these Supreme Court regulations needs to be enhanced by academics and practitioners so that their implementation in the future can be better.

Supplement Files

Keywords: Simple Lawsuit, Dispute Resolution, Sharia Economic Law

  1. Abdul Manan. Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.
  2. Ahmad Saebani, Beni. Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2008.
  3. Badilag MA RI. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah. BNRI Tahun 2016 Nomor 2059. (2016).
  4. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Pusat Bahasa. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2008.
  5. Dhiljam Nuhqila, Evita Premila. “Pengelolaan Tabungan Haji Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Syariah” 18, no. 1 (2020): 85–101.
  6. Gardner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing, 2004.
  7. Jitsuzumi, Toshiya. “Model Analysis on the Economic Impact of Paid Peering: Implications of the Netflix vs. SK Broadband Dispute.” Telecommunications Policy 48, no. 4 (2024): 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102736.
  8. M. Echols, Jhon; Shadily, Hassan. Kamus Inggris Indonesia-An English-Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2000.
  9. Mahkamah Agung RI, Perma Nomor 4. Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana (2019).
  10. Marhamah Saleh. “Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Perpektif Hukum Islam Dan Indonesia.” Journal Of Institution And Sharia Finance, n.d.
  11. MUI, Fatwa DSN. Pembiayaan Musyarakah, Tentang Pembiayaan Musyarakah § (2000).
  12. Mujahidin, Akhmad. Hukum Perbankan Syariah. Depok: PT. Rajafrafindo Persada, 2017.
  13. Nomor 3, Undanng-Undang. Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama (2006).
  14. Nurbaiti Prastyananda Yuwono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Koperasi Baitul Maal Wat Tamwil (BMT) Tidak Sehat Di Kota Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Hukum Islam (JHI) 18, no. Nomor 1 (2020): 37. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v18i1.2845.
  15. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (2009). Nomor 48.
  16. Perma RI Nomor 14. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Perkara Ekonomi Syariah.” In Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. Jakarta: Badilag MA, 2016.
  17. Pustaka Yustisia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia, 2015.
  18. Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Perihal Perkara Ekonomi Syariah (n.d.).
  19. Rahmi, Diana. “Ruang Lingkup Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Journal Of Institution And Sharia Finance 0 (2014): 1.
  20. Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2015.
  21. Sābiq, Sayyid. Fiqhu Al-Sunnah. Beirut-Libanon: Dār Al-Fikr, 1427.
  22. Sherwyn, David. “Arbitration of Employment-Discrimination Lawsuits: Legalities, Practicalities, and Realities.” The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 43, no. 6 (2002): 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8804(02)80072-6.
  23. Solihin, Dadin. “Tafsir Normatif Terhadap Perkembangan Politik Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Jurnal Pelita Nusa 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.61612/jpn.v1i1.5.
  24. Suadi, Amran. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah - Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
  25. ———. Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2020.
  26. Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005.
  27. Susanto, Yoghi Arief. “Gugatan Sederhana Pada Penyelesaian Sengeketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Dihubungkan Dengan Prinsip Ekonomi Syariah.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 3, no. 1 (2022): 81–100. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v3i1.17535.
  28. Undang-Undang Nomor 30. Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Undang-Undang § (1999).
  29. Whelan, Christopher J. Small Claim Court-A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
  30. Yunita, Ani. “Efektifitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 9, no. 1 (2021): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.9.1.25-36.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Dadin Solihin, Setiadi Setiadi, Bubun Bunyamin, Deni Kamaludin Yusup, Ahmad Hasan Ridwan
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

ULUL ALBAB: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam
Published by Department of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
Jl. Kaligawe Ray KM. 4 Semarang, Indonesia
Phone: +62 81359100363
Website: http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua
Email: jurnalululalbab@unissula.ac.id

ULUL ALBAB stats

ISSN: 2597-6168 (Print)
ISSN: 2597-6176 (Online)
DOI : 10.30659/jua

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps