Application of the Simple, Fast and Light Cost Principles in the Determination of Time for Case Settlement in the Religious Court / Syar’iyah Court in Perspective of Maqashid Syari’ah
Abstract
Courts under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia are always in the spotlight of the public and the media both about their performance and about the weaknesses and shortcomings in these institutions as judicial institutions that carry out the mandate of the provisions of the law. the determination of the time period for case settlement in various courts including the Religious Courts and the Syar’iyah Court quickly as mandated by the provisions of the Law which regulates that judicial procedures must be based on the principles of simple, fast and light costs. In reality, in judicial proceedings that take place in the Religious Courts and in the Syar’iyah Court, not always the principles of simplicity, speed and low cost can be applied. Often there are cases whose resolution takes a protracted time so that the litigants themselves certainly feel tired of undergoing all the existing judicial processes. When viewed from the point of view of Islamic law, a decision / law that is born by humans must actually be in line with the intent and purpose of the Islamic law itself or known as Maqashid al-Syari’ah. In this study using the type of library research (library research), the object of this research is a court decision, the nature of this research is Descriptive-analytic and Qualitative Data Analysis. The results of the study concluded that from the point of view of Maqashid al-Syari’ah, the application of the principles of simple, fast and light costs in case settlement in the Religious Courts and the Syar’iyah Court is classified as the application of Maqashid at the hajiyyah level, namely to provide convenience for justice seekers in obtaining access to justice as fair as possible.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Al-Bukhari, Al-Imam al-Hafidz Abi ‘Abdillah Ibn Ismail. (2003). Shahih al-Bukhari, Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm.
Ali, M. Hatta. (2012). Peradilan Sederhana Cepat & Biaya Ringan Menuju Keadilan Restoratif, Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Al-Qurthubi. (2009). Terjemahan Al-Jami’ li Ahkam al-Qur’an, terj. Ahmad Rijali Kadir, Jawa Timur: Pustaka Azzam.
Al-Yubi. (1998). Muhammad Said bin Ahmad bin Mas’ud, Maqashid al-Syari’ah al-Islamiyah wa ‘alaqatuha bi al-Adillah al-Syar’iyyah, Riyadh: Dar al-Hijrah.
Al-Zuhaily, Wahbah. (1986). Ushul al-Fiqh al-Islami, Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.
Anis, Ibrahim, dkk. (1972). al-Mu’jam al-Wasith, Mesir: Majma’ al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyah.
Dirjen Badilag. (2014). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama Buku II, Mahkamah Agung RI. Dirjen badilag.
Drs Amrullah,SF dkk. (1996). Dimensi Hukum Islam Dalam Sistim Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Fauzia, Ika Yunia dan Abdul Kadir Riyadi. (2014). Prinsip Dasar Ekonomi Islam Perspektif Maqashid al-Syari’ah, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2003). Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama (Undang-undang No 7 Tahun 1989), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset.
Ibn al-Manzhur. (1414 H). Lisan al-‘Arab, Beirut: Dar Shadir.
Lubis, Sulaikin, dkk. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana.
Makarao, Moh. Taufik. (2004). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Mapuna, Daeng Hadi. (2013). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Makassar: Alauddin University Press.
Mardani. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama & Mahkamah Syari’iyah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (1993). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Praja, Juhaya S. (1995). Filsafat Hukum Islam, Bandung: LPPM Universitas Islam Bandung.
Ratman, Desriza (2012). Mediasi Non-Litigasi Terhadap Sengkata Medik dengan Konsep Win-Win Solution, Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Rimdan. (2012). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sarwat, Ahmad. (2019). Maqashid Syari’ah, Jakarta: Rumah Fiqih Publishing.
Sarwono. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata Teori dan Prakik, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Setiawan. (1992). Aneka Masalah Hukum dan Hukum Acara Perdata, Bandung: PT Alumni.
Soerjono dan H. Abdurrahman. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, UI-Press.
Soeroso, R. (2003). Praktik Hukum Acara Perdata (Tata Cara Proses Persidangan), Jakarta: PT Sinar Grafika.
Sunggono, Bambang. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tim Peneliti. (2003). Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Islam (Fiqh), Jakarta: Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta bekerjasama dengan Bank Indonesia.
Tim Penyusun Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (1990). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Wahyudi, Abdullah Tri. (2004). Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wardah, Sri & Bambang Sutiyoso. (2007). Hukum Acara Perdata Dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
Journals:
Azzahiroh, Mumtaza, Dkk. (2020). Implementasi Aplikasi E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Pelayanan Publik yang Baik di Pengadilan Negeri Kota Padang, Jurnal Teknologi dan Komunikasi Pemerintah, Vol. 2 No. 2.
Haryanti, Tuti. (2013). Kewenangan Peradilan Agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi Syari’ah, Tahkim, Vol IX No. 1.
Ilham, Maya Hildawati. (2020). Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana dan Biaya Ringan, Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017, Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 7 No. 3.
Rosalina, Iga. (2012). Efektivitas Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Mandiri Perkotaan Pada Kelompok Pinjaman Bergulir Di Desa Mantren Kec Karangrejo Kabupaten Madetaan. Jurnal Efektivitas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Vol. 01 No 01.
Susanti, Christine. (2012). Penerapan Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial, Law Review, Vol. XII, No. 1.
Widowati. (2021). Hambatan Dalam Implementasi Asas Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan, Jurnal Hukum Yustitiabelen, Vol. 7 No. 1.
Zatadini, Nabila dan Syamsuri. (2018). Konsep Maqashid Syari’ah Menurut Al-Syatibi dan Kontribusinya Dalam Kebijakan Fiskal, Al-Falah: Journal of Islamic Economics, Vol. 3 No. 2.
Regulation:
Decree of the Director General of Religious Courts of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. (2020). About the Implementation of Electronic Case Administration in Religious Courts), Jakarta: director general badilag.
Law Number 4 of 2004 on Judicial Power.
Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2014 on Case Settlement at the Court of First Instance and Appeal Level in the 4 (four) Judicial Environments.
Supreme Court Circular Letter, Number: 02/Bua.6/Hs/SP/III/2014.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v10i2.34031
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id