The Legal Protection for The Use of A Notary's Right of Refusal in Investigations
Abstract
One of the responsibilities of a notary in carrying out his position in accordance with his obligations and promises of office is to keep everything about the deed he makes confidential. This writing, thus, aims to find out and analyze the procedures for using the rights and obligations of refusal by notaries in investigative examinations and the forms of legal protection for notaries who are examined in the criminal justice process. This research employed normative legal research methods emphasizing document study or library research. A normative juridical approach was carried out by reviewing and studying library materials in the form of statutory regulations relating to the problem under study. The notary's right of refusal applies relatively in the sense that if there are more specific rules that invalidate the right of refusal, the notary cannot exercise his right of refusal. The form of legal protection for notaries who are examined in the criminal justice process is contained in the UUJN (Act on Notary Position), in Article 66, stating that in carrying out a summons, law enforcement officials must request permission from the Notary Honorary Council. Legal protection, according to the Notary Honorary Council, is to supervise and inspect notaries so that they continue to walk the right path in accordance with the law; when a notary is summoned in a criminal case, the Notary Honorary Council has the authority to allow it to be examined or not.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books
Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2010, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Oemar Moechtar, 2017, Dasar-Dasar Teknik Pembuatan Akta, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2016, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke 12, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.
Santia Dewi, 2015, Panduan dan Praktik Notaris, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta.
Tan Thong Kie, 2011, Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.
Journal/Scientific Articles
Anandiaz Raditya Priandhana, 2021, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris dalam Proses Penyidikan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 16/PUU-XVIII/2020)”, Jurnal Indonesian Notary, Vol. 3 No. 12.
Dekky Septio Pramanda, dkk, 2023, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris Terkait Kewajiban Notaris untuk Merahasiakan Isi Akta dalam Proses Pemeriksaan di Tahap Penyidikan”, Tanjungpura Acta Borneo Journal, Vol. 1 No. 2.
Erdi, dkk, 2020, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dalam Melaksanakan Hak Dan Kewajiban Ingkar Notaris Pada Saat Penyidikan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia”, Delegalata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 2.
Irene Dwi Enggarwati, 2015, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Diperiksa Oleh Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Keterangan Palsu Pada Akta Otentik”. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya, Vol. 1 No. 1.
Martalena, 2020, “Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris Oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN) dalam Dugaan Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris Pada Tingkat Penyidikan”, Jurnal Swara Justisia, Vol. 4 No. 2.
Ni Luh Putu Sri Purnama Dewi, dkk, 2018, “Hak Ingkar Notaris sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hukum”, Jurnal Acta Comitas, Vol. 1 No. 1.
Tulus Pujiono, 2006, “Penerapan UUPA Belum Optimal”, Majalah Renvoi, No. 7.43.IV Edisi 3.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v11i4.41370
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL AKTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akta has been indexed by:
Editorial Office: Jurnal Akta Room 2nd Floor Imam As Syafei Building Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Jln. Kaligawe KM. 4, Semarang City, Central Java, Indonesia. Phone +62 24 6583584 Fax +62 24 6582455
Email: jurnalakta@unissula.ac.id